Comparative life cycle assessment of solid waste management strategies

The “cradle-to-grave” human and environmental impacts of municipal solid waste (MSW) management practices are often evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) methods and tools. Many MSW LCA methods have been previously proposed, however, research suggests that the applicability of a given method i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clean technologies and environmental policy 2016-06, Vol.18 (5), p.1515-1524
Main Authors: Coventry, Zachary A., Tize, Ronald, Karunanithi, Arunprakash T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cities
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
Environmental Economics
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Environmental impact
Environmental policy
Geography
Heat treatment
Industrial and Production Engineering
Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering
Land
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Life cycle engineering
Life cycles
Municipal solid waste
Municipal waste management
Original Paper
Policies
Policy making
Resource management
Separation
Solid waste management
Strategy
Sustainable Development
Waste disposal
Waste management
Waste management industry
Waste treatment
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The “cradle-to-grave” human and environmental impacts of municipal solid waste (MSW) management practices are often evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) methods and tools. Many MSW LCA methods have been previously proposed, however, research suggests that the applicability of a given method is limited by geography. This paper sets forth the city of Austin, Texas as a fair representation of a “typical” U.S. city from the perspective of MSW treatment and disposal. It then describes the methods and findings of a comparative LCA of four different waste treatment scenarios in the city of Austin. In addition, the paper presents a unique approach, termed as orders of separation, to clearly establish and communicate LCA upstream and downstream considerations. The paper’s findings suggest that most life cycle impacts are from treating the MSW and that thermal treatment strategies are generally preferable to land filling strategies. Consequently, it may be justifiable to transport wastes longer distances to reach a thermal treatment facility. The findings of this paper will be of interest to solid waste managers and policy makers to compare different treatment options for U.S. cities. Graphical Abstract
ISSN:1618-954X
1618-9558
DOI:10.1007/s10098-015-1086-7