Loading…

Camera-tracking gaming control device for evaluation of active wrist flexion and extension

Abstract Study Design Cross sectional. Introduction Measuring wrist range of motion (ROM) is an essential procedure in hand therapy clinics. Purpose of the Study To test the reliability and validity of a dynamic ROM assessment, the Camera Wrist Tracker (CWT). Methods Wrist flexion and extension ROM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hand therapy 2017-01, Vol.30 (1), p.89-96
Main Authors: Shefer Eini, Dalit, MSc, OT, Ratzon, Navah Z., PhD, OT, Rizzo, Albert A., PhD, Yeh, Shih-Ching, PhD, Lange, Belinda, PhD, PT, Yaffe, Batia, MD, Daich, Alexander, MD, Weiss, Patrice L., PhD, OT, Kizony, Rachel, PhD, OT
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Study Design Cross sectional. Introduction Measuring wrist range of motion (ROM) is an essential procedure in hand therapy clinics. Purpose of the Study To test the reliability and validity of a dynamic ROM assessment, the Camera Wrist Tracker (CWT). Methods Wrist flexion and extension ROM of 15 patients with distal radius fractures and 15 matched controls were assessed with the CWT and with a universal goniometer. Results One-way model intraclass correlation coefficient analysis indicated high test-retest reliability for extension (ICC = 0.92) and moderate reliability for flexion (ICC = 0.49). Standard error for extension was 2.45° and for flexion was 4.07°. Repeated-measures analysis revealed a significant main effect for group; ROM was greater in the control group (F[1, 28] = 47.35; P < .001). The concurrent validity of the CWT was partially supported. Conclusion The results indicate that the CWT may provide highly reliable scores for dynamic wrist extension ROM, and moderately reliable scores for flexion, in people recovering from a distal radius fracture. Level of Evidence N/A.
ISSN:0894-1130
1545-004X
DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2016.07.002