Ventral hernia repair in patients with abdominal loss of domain: an observational study of one institution’s experience

• Published in: Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 2017-04, Vol.21 (2), p.245-252
• Main Authors: Azar, F. K., Crawford, T. C., Poruk, K. E., Farrow, N., Cornell, P., Nadra, O., Azoury, S. C., Soares, K. C., Cooney, C. M., Eckhauser, F. E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdominal Cavity - diagnostic imaging; Abdominal Cavity - pathology; Abdominal Surgery; Abdominal Wall - diagnostic imaging; Abdominal Wall - pathology; Abdominal Wall - surgery; Acellular Dermis; Female; Hernia, Ventral - diagnostic imaging; Hernia, Ventral - surgery; Herniorrhaphy - methods; Humans; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Organ Size; Original Article; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Mesh
• ISSN: 1265-4906; 1248-9204
• DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1576-0

Purpose Abdominal wall hernias are a common problem. The success of abdominal wall reconstruction decreases with increasing hernia size. This study summarizes the outcomes of one surgeon’s experience using a “sandwich” technique for hernia repair in patients with loss of abdominal domain. Methods We reviewed our ventral hernia repair (VHR) experience from 2008 to 2015 among patients with loss of domain, as defined by a hernia defect greater than 300 cm 2 . The percent of herniation through the defect, defined by a hernia sac-to-abdominal cavity volume ratio, was measured on preoperative CT scans by four independent reviewers and averaged. Outcomes were compared among those with giant ventral hernias (hernia sac-to-abdominal cavity volume >30%) and those with smaller defect ratios. Results Over the study period, 21 patients underwent VHR. In 17 patients (81%), a “sandwich” technique was utilized. Ten patients had hernia sac-to-abdominal cavity defects less than 30%, and 11 had defects greater than 30%. Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups with the exception of a higher ASA score in those with giant ventral hernias and more Ventral Hernia Working Group Grade 3 hernias in those without giant ventral hernias. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. There were no mortalities. There were two recurrences (18%) in the giant VHR group and none in the smaller defect group ( p  = 0.16). Surgical site occurrences were noted in 48% of patients and did not differ between giant and non-giant VHR groups (50 vs 45%, p  = 0.84). Average postoperative length of stay was significantly longer in the giant VHR group (31 vs. 17 days, p  = 0.03). Conclusions Our results suggest that the “sandwich” technique for VHR is a safe and durable method to restore abdominal wall integrity in those with LOD, even in patients with giant ventral hernias.