Bundling the procurement of sports infrastructure projects: How neither public nor private actors really benefit

Public-private partnerships for infrastructure development are often conceived as puzzling governance tools. A peculiar case in Belgium has been the procurement of multiple similar projects to single private sector partners who design, build, finance and maintain infrastructure for a fixed period—bu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environment and planning. C, Government & policy Government & policy, 2016-12, Vol.34 (8), p.1369-1386
Main Author: van den Hurk, Martijn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Belgium
Competition
Infrastructure
Local government
Procurement
Project evaluation
Project finance
Public private partnerships
Sports
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Public-private partnerships for infrastructure development are often conceived as puzzling governance tools. A peculiar case in Belgium has been the procurement of multiple similar projects to single private sector partners who design, build, finance and maintain infrastructure for a fixed period—bundled procurement. Under the umbrella of the Flemish Sports Infrastructure Program, several of these bundles were tendered, particularly in order to achieve economies of scale. However, bundled procurement came at a price. This article scrutinizes its tense relationship with local governments' interests and competitive tendering. It shows that competition was hampered to a certain extent, but an equally important role in this respect was played by high contractual demands. As for local interests, in some cases the voice of local governments was given too much weight during the procurement phase. Consequently, political interests intervened and uncertainty arose.
ISSN:0263-774X
1472-3425
DOI:10.1177/0263774X15614672