Loading…

Effects of Stem Fraction on the Optimization of Biomass Allocation and Maximum Photosynthetic Capacity

1. A model was developed to examine effects of the stem biomass fraction on the optimal responses of plants to soil nitrogen availability. 2. Our model predicts that the optimal leaf: root ratio and optimal photosynthetic capacity (Pmax) increase with soil N availability. For a given N availability,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Functional ecology 2003-10, Vol.17 (5), p.627-636
Main Authors: Osone, Y., Tateno, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1. A model was developed to examine effects of the stem biomass fraction on the optimal responses of plants to soil nitrogen availability. 2. Our model predicts that the optimal leaf: root ratio and optimal photosynthetic capacity (Pmax) increase with soil N availability. For a given N availability, the optimal leaf: root ratio decreases and the optimal Pmaxincreases with increasing stem fraction. As a result, the increase in optimal leaf: root ratio is smaller, and that in optimal Pmaxis greater, in response to increasing N availability when stem fraction is large. 3. To test these predictions we grew two herbs with different stem fractions: Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. et Zucc. and Chenopodium album L. Showing excellent agreement with the simulation results, the leaf N concentration and leaf: root ratio of the two herbs increased with increasing N availability, and leaf N concentration was larger for C. album with higher stem fraction than P. cuspidatum. 4. The general tendency for plants with larger stem fractions also to have greater leaf N concentrations and Pmaxwas demonstrated for a wide range of temperate herbs. This suggests that stem fraction may be a source of variation in Pmaxamong plants in the same functional group.
ISSN:0269-8463
1365-2435
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00763.x