Walking in the shoes of others: Experimental testing of dual-interest and empathy in environmental choice

• Published in: The Journal of socio-economics 2012-10, Vol.41 (5), p.642-653
• Main Authors: Czap, Natalia V., Czap, Hans J., Khachaturyan, Marianna, Lynne, Gary D., Burbach, Mark
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Choices; Conservation; Conservation policy; Dual-interest model; Economic Models; Empathy; Environmental economics; Environmental experiment; Farmers; Freshwater; Laboratories; Metaeconomics; Profits; Selfism; Studies; Technology; Water quality; Water Supply
• ISSN: 1053-5357; 2214-8043; 1879-1239; 2214-8051
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2012.05.005

► We designed a framed experiment of an upstream–downstream water pollution problem to test the dual-interest metaeconomic framework. ► Subjects are tempering profit maximization with empathy-based, environmentally conscious behavior. ► The dual-interest metaeconomic model is superior in explaining actual behavior to the standard neoclassical model. ► Adjusting the dual-interest model for the personality traits of empathy and selfism and including gender improves the estimation results. ► Environmental ethics and empathy–sympathy play an important role in environmental economics models. This paper further tests dual interest theory and the metaeconomics approach to environmental choice, recognizing a possible role for empathy–sympathy (the basis for an internalized, shared other-interest) in tempering and conditioning the more fundamental tendency to pursue self-interest. To test, we focus on rivers flowing through agricultural areas carrying sediments, chemicals, and fertilizers which are making their way into downstream rivers and lakes. We conduct a framed laboratory experiment modeling this problem: farmers decide on the usage of conservation technology to lessen impacts on the water quality (i.e. on the commons, the capacity to absorb these wastes) in downstream areas, which is more costly than the alternative intensive technology. The results confirm our hypotheses, demonstrating that Upstream Farmers who practice conservation are tempering profit maximization with empathy-based, environmentally conscious behavior. Such behavior better serves the farmers’ own-interest, and also helps Downstream Water Users. Environmental economics models need to explicitly include empathy–sympathy and the moral–ethical context it produces, providing a more scientific basis for conservation policy and programs.