Loading…
The impact of body mass index on the risk of high spinal block in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study
Purpose To investigate the hypothesis that the risk of high spinal block is not increased in obese parturients undergoing cesarean delivery compared to non-obese parturients. Methods This is a retrospective study at an academic center. We searched the perioperative database for women who underwent c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of anesthesia 2017-08, Vol.31 (4), p.552-558 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
To investigate the hypothesis that the risk of high spinal block is not increased in obese parturients undergoing cesarean delivery compared to non-obese parturients.
Methods
This is a retrospective study at an academic center. We searched the perioperative database for women who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine ≥10.5 mg. A body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m
2
was defined as obese. We categorized obesity into: obesity class I (BMI = 30–34.9 kg/m
2
), obesity class II (BMI = 35–39.9 kg/m
2
), obesity class III (BMI = 40–49.9 kg/m
2
), and super obese (BMI ≥50 kg/m
2
). The primary outcome was high spinal block defined as need to convert to general anesthesia within 20 min of spinal placement as a result of altered mental status, weakness, or respiratory distress resulting from the high block, or a recorded block height ≥T1.
Results
The analysis included 5015 women. High spinal blocks occurred in 29 patients (0.6%). The risk of high spinal was significantly different according to BMI (
p
= 0.025). In a multivariate model, BMI (
p
= 0.008) and cesarean delivery priority (
p
= 0.009) were associated with high blocks. BMI ≥50 kg/m
2
was associated with greater odds of high block compared to BMI |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0913-8668 1438-8359 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00540-017-2352-0 |