Loading…
Trilobed pedicled superior gluteal artery perforator flap for lumbosacral defect coverage
Background There are many available options for the coverage of lumbosacral area defects. Surgeons usually use the superior gluteal artery perforator flap (SGAP) by rotational fashion, which risks complications, such as wound dehiscence or skin necrosis at the Y‐point on the donor site due to the te...
Saved in:
Published in: | Microsurgery 2017-11, Vol.37 (8), p.890-895 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
There are many available options for the coverage of lumbosacral area defects. Surgeons usually use the superior gluteal artery perforator flap (SGAP) by rotational fashion, which risks complications, such as wound dehiscence or skin necrosis at the Y‐point on the donor site due to the tension. In this report, the authors present the experience of using trilobed pedicled SGAP flaps in coverage of the lumbosacral area defects.
Methods
From 2011 to 2015, 16 trilobed pedicled SGAP flaps were performed for the coverage of sacral defects in our facility. The average defect sizes were 9.3 cm × 7.4 cm (ranging from 5 cm × 4 cm to 13 cm × 13 cm ). Trilobed flap were designed to include a reliable perforator vessel and rotated 90 degrees to the defect. All flaps included only one perforator vessel.
Results
The average of flap sizes were 15.9 cm × 9.2 cm (ranging from 10 cm × 20 to 5 cm × 15 cm). Two cases of minimal distal margin necrosis ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0738-1085 1098-2752 |
DOI: | 10.1002/micr.30172 |