Loading…

The protein interacting with carboxyl terminus‐1 codon 389 polymorphism impairs protein interacting with carboxyl terminus‐1 function and is a risk factor for uterine cervical cancer

PICT‐1 is a nucleolar protein with various tumor suppressor functions. Recently, PICT‐1 expression was reported to be dramatically reduced in several cancers. To investigate the role of PICT‐1 in uterine cervical carcinogenesis, we examined its gene mutations, protein expression, cellular localizati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular carcinogenesis 2017-05, Vol.56 (5), p.1484-1492
Main Authors: Yoshimoto, Masafumi, Tokuda, Aoi, Nishiwaki, Kunihiko, Sengoku, Kazuo, Yaginuma, Yuji
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PICT‐1 is a nucleolar protein with various tumor suppressor functions. Recently, PICT‐1 expression was reported to be dramatically reduced in several cancers. To investigate the role of PICT‐1 in uterine cervical carcinogenesis, we examined its gene mutations, protein expression, cellular localization, and effect on p53 stabilization. PCR‐SSCP analysis of the entire coding region of PICT‐1 showed that a polymorphism at codon 389 may increase the risk of uterine cervical cancers, and also identified a novel missense mutation. Expression of wild‐type PICT‐1 inhibited the degradation of p53 in the presence or absence of HPV 18 E6 viral protein in vitro, while the expression of codon 389 polymorphic PICT‐1 had a diminished inhibitory effect on p53 degradation. Moreover, we observed that PICT‐1 degradation was induced both independently and cooperatively by E6 and E7 proteins from high‐risk HPVs, but only marginal degradation was observed with proteins from low‐risk HPV. Immunohistochemical staining of tumor samples revealed that lower levels of PICT‐1 were observed in samples from CIN III and cervical cancer tissues, compared to normal cervical epithelium and CIN I, II tissues (P 
ISSN:0899-1987
1098-2744
DOI:10.1002/mc.22608