Loading…

Airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by isothiazolinones in water‐based paints: a retrospective study of 44 cases

Summary Background Airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by paints containing isothiazolinones has been recognized as a health hazard. Objectives To collect epidemiological, clinical and patch test data on airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by isothiazolinone‐containing paints in Fran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contact dermatitis 2017-09, Vol.77 (3), p.163-170
Main Authors: Amsler, Emmanuelle, Aerts, Olivier, Raison‐Peyron, Nadia, Debons, Michèle, Milpied, Brigitte, Giordano‐Labadie, Françoise, Waton, Julie, Ferrier‐Le Bouëdec, Marie C., Lartigau, Isabelle, Pecquet, Catherine, Assier, Haudrey, Avenel‐Audran, Martine, Bernier, Claire, Castelain, Florence, Collet, Evelyne, Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle, Genillier, Nathalie, Girardin, Pascal, Pralong, Pauline, Tetart, Florence, Vital‐Durand, Dominique, Soria, Angele, Barbaud, Annick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background Airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by paints containing isothiazolinones has been recognized as a health hazard. Objectives To collect epidemiological, clinical and patch test data on airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by isothiazolinone‐containing paints in France and Belgium. Methods A descriptive, retrospective study was initiated by the Dermatology and Allergy Group of the French Society of Dermatology, including methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI)‐ and/or MI‐sensitized patients who developed airborne allergic contact dermatitis following exposure to isothiazolinone‐containing paint. Results Forty‐four cases were identified, with mostly non‐occupational exposure (79.5%). Of the patients, 22.5% of also had mucosal symptoms. In several cases, the dermatitis required systemic corticosteroids (27.3%), hospitalization (9.1%), and/or sick leave (20.5%). A median delay of 5.5 weeks was necessary to enable patients to enter a freshly painted room without a flare‐up of their dermatitis. Approximately one‐fifth of the patients knew that they were allergic to MI and/or MCI/MI before the exposure to paints occurred. Conclusion Our series confirms that airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by paints containing isothiazolinones is not rare, and may be severe and long‐lasting. Better regulation of isothiazolinone concentrations in paints, and their adequate labelling, is urgently needed.
ISSN:0105-1873
1600-0536
DOI:10.1111/cod.12795