Delayed Plumage Maturation in Passerine Birds: Reliable Signaling by Subordinate Males?

• Published in: Evolution 1986-05, Vol.40 (3), p.605-615
• Main Authors: Lyon, Bruce E., Montgomerie, Robert D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal ethology; Aves; Biological and medical sciences; Breeding; Female animals; Finches; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Male animals; Mating behavior; Mimicry; Orioles; Plumage; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Sexual selection; Vertebrata; Warblers
• ISSN: 0014-3820; 1558-5646
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00511.x

Three hypotheses (Cryptic, Female Mimicry, and Winter Adaptation) have been proposed to explain the occurrence of delayed plumage maturation (DPM) in passerine birds. We show that each of these hypotheses is really a composite of two different questions about: 1) the proximate function of dull plumage in second year (SY) males and 2) the selective mechanism that has favored that proximate function. We review the three hypotheses in the context of this distinction, and we find little evidence clearly supporting any of them. We propose a new Status Signaling Hypothesis (SSH) suggesting that dull SY male plumage is a reliable signal of subordinance. We suggest that female choice based on male plumage color (as an index of male quality) is the selective mechanism that has favored subordinate status signaling by SY males. If females prefer bright males, then dull plumage may be a reliable signal of subordinance and SY males may experience reduced levels of aggression from adult males. Male characters (like plumage color) are most likely to be the object of female choice when males defend simple nesting territories with little or no variation in territory quality. In such a system, SY males with low resource-holding potential would benefit (via matings or experience) by signaling subordinance and being allowed to settle among more brightly colored adults. Thus, DPM is expected to be more prevalent when males defend simple nesting territories. This prediction of the SSH is supported by data from the literature-a significantly higher proportion of species with DPM defend simple nesting territories (versus all-purpose territories) than do species without DPM.