Loading…

Ultrasound shear wave elastography in the assessment of passive biceps brachii muscle stiffness: influences of sex and elbow position

Abstract Objective To assess differences in biceps brachii muscle (BBM) stiffness as evaluated by ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE). Methods The passive stiffness of the BBM was quantified with shear wave velocity (SWV) measurements obtained from 10 healthy volunteers (5 men and 5 women, mean...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical imaging 2017-09, Vol.45, p.26-29
Main Authors: Chen, Johnson, O'Dell, Michael, He, Wen, Du, Li-Juan, Li, Pai-Chi, Gao, Jing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To assess differences in biceps brachii muscle (BBM) stiffness as evaluated by ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE). Methods The passive stiffness of the BBM was quantified with shear wave velocity (SWV) measurements obtained from 10 healthy volunteers (5 men and 5 women, mean age 50 years, age range 42–63 years) with the elbow at full extension and 30° flexion in this IRB-approved study. Potential differences between two depths within the muscle, two elbow positions, the two arms, and sexes were assessed by using two-tailed t-test. The reproducibility of SWV measurements was tested by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Significantly higher passive BBM stiffness was found at full elbow extension compared to 30° of flexion (p ≤ 0.00006 for both arms). Significantly higher passive stiffness in women was seen for the right arm (p = 0.04 for both elbow positions). Good correlation of shear wave velocity measured at the different depths. The ICC for interobserver and intraobserver variation was high. Conclusions SWE is a reliable quantitative tool for assessing BBM stiffness, with differences in stiffness based on elbow position demonstrated and based on sex suggested.
ISSN:0899-7071
1873-4499
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.05.017