Loading…

A targeted noise reduction observational study for reducing noise in a neonatal intensive unit

Background: Excessive noise in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can interfere with infants’ growth, development and healing. Local problem: Sound levels in our NICUs exceeded the recommended levels by the World Health Organization. Methods: We implemented a noise reduction strategy in an urban,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of perinatology 2017-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1060-1064
Main Authors: Chawla, S, Barach, P, Dwaihy, M, Kamat, D, Shankaran, S, Panaitescu, B, Wang, B, Natarajan, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6d1e5df2d82c2acdf8e85839cd453e716689cd9a8b69db0f6ffb6d93ceb21a83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6d1e5df2d82c2acdf8e85839cd453e716689cd9a8b69db0f6ffb6d93ceb21a83
container_end_page 1064
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1060
container_title Journal of perinatology
container_volume 37
creator Chawla, S
Barach, P
Dwaihy, M
Kamat, D
Shankaran, S
Panaitescu, B
Wang, B
Natarajan, G
description Background: Excessive noise in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can interfere with infants’ growth, development and healing. Local problem: Sound levels in our NICUs exceeded the recommended levels by the World Health Organization. Methods: We implemented a noise reduction strategy in an urban, tertiary academic medical center NICU that included baseline noise measurements. We conducted a survey involving staff and visitors regarding their opinions and perceptions of noise levels in the NICU. Ongoing feedback to staff after each measurement cycle was provided to improve awareness, engagement and adherence with noise reduction strategies. After widespread discussion with active clinician involvement, consensus building and iterative testing, changes were implemented including: lowering of equipment alarm sounds, designated ‘quiet times’ and implementing a customized education program for staff. Interventions: A multiphase noise reduction quality improvement (QI) intervention to reduce ambient sound levels in a patient care room in our NICUs by 3 dB (20%) over 18 months. Results: The noise in the NICU was reduced by 3 dB from baseline. Mean (s.d.) baseline, phase 2 , 3 and 4 noise levels in the two NICUs were: LAeq: 57.0 (0.84), 56.8 (1.6), 55.3 (1.9) and 54.5 (2.6) dB, respectively ( P 90%. Conclusions: Implementing a multipronged QI initiative resulted in significant noise level reduction in two multipod NICUs. It is feasible to reduce noise levels if QI interventions are coupled with active engagement of the clinical staff and following continuous process of improvement methods, measurements and protocols.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/jp.2017.93
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910339090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A504408879</galeid><sourcerecordid>A504408879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6d1e5df2d82c2acdf8e85839cd453e716689cd9a8b69db0f6ffb6d93ceb21a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ltrFDEUAOBBFLtWX_wBMiAUUWbNZSaXx6V4g4Iv-mrIJCfbLLPJmmQK_fdm2FVbFclDQvKdJCc5TfMcozVGVLzdHdYEYb6W9EGzwj1n3TD09GGzQrynnaA9O2ue5LxDaFnkj5szIhjmPcGr5tumLTptoYBtQ_QZ2gR2NsXH0MYxQ7rRy1hPbS6zvW1dTEfhw_YU4EOr2wAVlcp8KBCyv4F2Dr48bR45PWV4durPm6_v3325_Nhdff7w6XJz1Zme89JpZjEM1hEriCHaWCdADIJKY_uBAseMiTqWWoxM2hE55tzIrKQGRoK1oOfNq-O-hxS_z5CL2vtsYJp0vdicFZb1pahEElX68g-6i3OqGWZFGB4GSong_1NYUjFQLAj7rbZ6AuWDiyVpsxytNgPqeyQEl1Wt_6Fqs7D3JgZwvs7fC7i4E3ANeirXOU7z8hP5Pnx9hCbFnBM4dUh-r9OtwkgttaF2B7XUhpK04henlOZxD_YX_VkMFbw5glyXwhbSnZz_3u4HZPjAcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938531826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A targeted noise reduction observational study for reducing noise in a neonatal intensive unit</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Chawla, S ; Barach, P ; Dwaihy, M ; Kamat, D ; Shankaran, S ; Panaitescu, B ; Wang, B ; Natarajan, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Chawla, S ; Barach, P ; Dwaihy, M ; Kamat, D ; Shankaran, S ; Panaitescu, B ; Wang, B ; Natarajan, G</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Excessive noise in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can interfere with infants’ growth, development and healing. Local problem: Sound levels in our NICUs exceeded the recommended levels by the World Health Organization. Methods: We implemented a noise reduction strategy in an urban, tertiary academic medical center NICU that included baseline noise measurements. We conducted a survey involving staff and visitors regarding their opinions and perceptions of noise levels in the NICU. Ongoing feedback to staff after each measurement cycle was provided to improve awareness, engagement and adherence with noise reduction strategies. After widespread discussion with active clinician involvement, consensus building and iterative testing, changes were implemented including: lowering of equipment alarm sounds, designated ‘quiet times’ and implementing a customized education program for staff. Interventions: A multiphase noise reduction quality improvement (QI) intervention to reduce ambient sound levels in a patient care room in our NICUs by 3 dB (20%) over 18 months. Results: The noise in the NICU was reduced by 3 dB from baseline. Mean (s.d.) baseline, phase 2 , 3 and 4 noise levels in the two NICUs were: LAeq: 57.0 (0.84), 56.8 (1.6), 55.3 (1.9) and 54.5 (2.6) dB, respectively ( P &lt;0.01). Adherence with the planned process measure of ‘quiet times’ was &gt;90%. Conclusions: Implementing a multipronged QI initiative resulted in significant noise level reduction in two multipod NICUs. It is feasible to reduce noise levels if QI interventions are coupled with active engagement of the clinical staff and following continuous process of improvement methods, measurements and protocols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-8346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/jp.2017.93</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28617421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>692/700/1720/3186 ; 692/700/784 ; Academic Medical Centers ; Acoustics ; Alarm systems ; Background noise ; Customization ; Environmental aspects ; Family ; Feedback ; Female ; Health care facilities ; Health Personnel ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant development ; Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight ; Infant, Premature ; Infants ; Intensive care units ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization &amp; administration ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards ; Intervention ; Male ; Management ; Measurement methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Methods ; Neonatal intensive care units ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Noise control ; Noise levels ; Noise reduction ; Noise, Occupational - adverse effects ; Noise, Occupational - prevention &amp; control ; Observational studies ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics ; Physiological aspects ; Quality control ; Quality Improvement ; quality-improvement-article ; Safety and security measures ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of perinatology, 2017-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1060-1064</ispartof><rights>Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2017</rights><rights>Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6d1e5df2d82c2acdf8e85839cd453e716689cd9a8b69db0f6ffb6d93ceb21a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6d1e5df2d82c2acdf8e85839cd453e716689cd9a8b69db0f6ffb6d93ceb21a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28617421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chawla, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barach, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwaihy, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamat, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankaran, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panaitescu, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natarajan, G</creatorcontrib><title>A targeted noise reduction observational study for reducing noise in a neonatal intensive unit</title><title>Journal of perinatology</title><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><description>Background: Excessive noise in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can interfere with infants’ growth, development and healing. Local problem: Sound levels in our NICUs exceeded the recommended levels by the World Health Organization. Methods: We implemented a noise reduction strategy in an urban, tertiary academic medical center NICU that included baseline noise measurements. We conducted a survey involving staff and visitors regarding their opinions and perceptions of noise levels in the NICU. Ongoing feedback to staff after each measurement cycle was provided to improve awareness, engagement and adherence with noise reduction strategies. After widespread discussion with active clinician involvement, consensus building and iterative testing, changes were implemented including: lowering of equipment alarm sounds, designated ‘quiet times’ and implementing a customized education program for staff. Interventions: A multiphase noise reduction quality improvement (QI) intervention to reduce ambient sound levels in a patient care room in our NICUs by 3 dB (20%) over 18 months. Results: The noise in the NICU was reduced by 3 dB from baseline. Mean (s.d.) baseline, phase 2 , 3 and 4 noise levels in the two NICUs were: LAeq: 57.0 (0.84), 56.8 (1.6), 55.3 (1.9) and 54.5 (2.6) dB, respectively ( P &lt;0.01). Adherence with the planned process measure of ‘quiet times’ was &gt;90%. Conclusions: Implementing a multipronged QI initiative resulted in significant noise level reduction in two multipod NICUs. It is feasible to reduce noise levels if QI interventions are coupled with active engagement of the clinical staff and following continuous process of improvement methods, measurements and protocols.</description><subject>692/700/1720/3186</subject><subject>692/700/784</subject><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Alarm systems</subject><subject>Background noise</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant development</subject><subject>Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neonatal intensive care units</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Noise control</subject><subject>Noise levels</subject><subject>Noise reduction</subject><subject>Noise, Occupational - adverse effects</subject><subject>Noise, Occupational - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>quality-improvement-article</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0743-8346</issn><issn>1476-5543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90ltrFDEUAOBBFLtWX_wBMiAUUWbNZSaXx6V4g4Iv-mrIJCfbLLPJmmQK_fdm2FVbFclDQvKdJCc5TfMcozVGVLzdHdYEYb6W9EGzwj1n3TD09GGzQrynnaA9O2ue5LxDaFnkj5szIhjmPcGr5tumLTptoYBtQ_QZ2gR2NsXH0MYxQ7rRy1hPbS6zvW1dTEfhw_YU4EOr2wAVlcp8KBCyv4F2Dr48bR45PWV4durPm6_v3325_Nhdff7w6XJz1Zme89JpZjEM1hEriCHaWCdADIJKY_uBAseMiTqWWoxM2hE55tzIrKQGRoK1oOfNq-O-hxS_z5CL2vtsYJp0vdicFZb1pahEElX68g-6i3OqGWZFGB4GSong_1NYUjFQLAj7rbZ6AuWDiyVpsxytNgPqeyQEl1Wt_6Fqs7D3JgZwvs7fC7i4E3ANeirXOU7z8hP5Pnx9hCbFnBM4dUh-r9OtwkgttaF2B7XUhpK04henlOZxD_YX_VkMFbw5glyXwhbSnZz_3u4HZPjAcQ</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Chawla, S</creator><creator>Barach, P</creator><creator>Dwaihy, M</creator><creator>Kamat, D</creator><creator>Shankaran, S</creator><creator>Panaitescu, B</creator><creator>Wang, B</creator><creator>Natarajan, G</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>A targeted noise reduction observational study for reducing noise in a neonatal intensive unit</title><author>Chawla, S ; Barach, P ; Dwaihy, M ; Kamat, D ; Shankaran, S ; Panaitescu, B ; Wang, B ; Natarajan, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6d1e5df2d82c2acdf8e85839cd453e716689cd9a8b69db0f6ffb6d93ceb21a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>692/700/1720/3186</topic><topic>692/700/784</topic><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Alarm systems</topic><topic>Background noise</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant development</topic><topic>Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neonatal intensive care units</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Noise control</topic><topic>Noise levels</topic><topic>Noise reduction</topic><topic>Noise, Occupational - adverse effects</topic><topic>Noise, Occupational - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>quality-improvement-article</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chawla, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barach, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwaihy, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamat, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankaran, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panaitescu, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natarajan, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chawla, S</au><au>Barach, P</au><au>Dwaihy, M</au><au>Kamat, D</au><au>Shankaran, S</au><au>Panaitescu, B</au><au>Wang, B</au><au>Natarajan, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A targeted noise reduction observational study for reducing noise in a neonatal intensive unit</atitle><jtitle>Journal of perinatology</jtitle><stitle>J Perinatol</stitle><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1060</spage><epage>1064</epage><pages>1060-1064</pages><issn>0743-8346</issn><eissn>1476-5543</eissn><abstract>Background: Excessive noise in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can interfere with infants’ growth, development and healing. Local problem: Sound levels in our NICUs exceeded the recommended levels by the World Health Organization. Methods: We implemented a noise reduction strategy in an urban, tertiary academic medical center NICU that included baseline noise measurements. We conducted a survey involving staff and visitors regarding their opinions and perceptions of noise levels in the NICU. Ongoing feedback to staff after each measurement cycle was provided to improve awareness, engagement and adherence with noise reduction strategies. After widespread discussion with active clinician involvement, consensus building and iterative testing, changes were implemented including: lowering of equipment alarm sounds, designated ‘quiet times’ and implementing a customized education program for staff. Interventions: A multiphase noise reduction quality improvement (QI) intervention to reduce ambient sound levels in a patient care room in our NICUs by 3 dB (20%) over 18 months. Results: The noise in the NICU was reduced by 3 dB from baseline. Mean (s.d.) baseline, phase 2 , 3 and 4 noise levels in the two NICUs were: LAeq: 57.0 (0.84), 56.8 (1.6), 55.3 (1.9) and 54.5 (2.6) dB, respectively ( P &lt;0.01). Adherence with the planned process measure of ‘quiet times’ was &gt;90%. Conclusions: Implementing a multipronged QI initiative resulted in significant noise level reduction in two multipod NICUs. It is feasible to reduce noise levels if QI interventions are coupled with active engagement of the clinical staff and following continuous process of improvement methods, measurements and protocols.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>28617421</pmid><doi>10.1038/jp.2017.93</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0743-8346
ispartof Journal of perinatology, 2017-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1060-1064
issn 0743-8346
1476-5543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910339090
source Springer Nature
subjects 692/700/1720/3186
692/700/784
Academic Medical Centers
Acoustics
Alarm systems
Background noise
Customization
Environmental aspects
Family
Feedback
Female
Health care facilities
Health Personnel
Hospitals
Humans
Infant
Infant development
Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight
Infant, Premature
Infants
Intensive care units
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization & administration
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards
Intervention
Male
Management
Measurement methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Neonatal intensive care units
Neonates
Newborn babies
Noise control
Noise levels
Noise reduction
Noise, Occupational - adverse effects
Noise, Occupational - prevention & control
Observational studies
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
Physiological aspects
Quality control
Quality Improvement
quality-improvement-article
Safety and security measures
Surveys and Questionnaires
title A targeted noise reduction observational study for reducing noise in a neonatal intensive unit
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A05%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20targeted%20noise%20reduction%20observational%20study%20for%20reducing%20noise%20in%20a%20neonatal%20intensive%20unit&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20perinatology&rft.au=Chawla,%20S&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1060&rft.epage=1064&rft.pages=1060-1064&rft.issn=0743-8346&rft.eissn=1476-5543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/jp.2017.93&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA504408879%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6d1e5df2d82c2acdf8e85839cd453e716689cd9a8b69db0f6ffb6d93ceb21a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938531826&rft_id=info:pmid/28617421&rft_galeid=A504408879&rfr_iscdi=true