Loading…

Shape Universality Classes in the Random Sequential Adsorption of Nonspherical Particles

Random sequential adsorption (RSA) of particles of a particular shape is used in a large variety of contexts to model particle aggregation and jamming. A key feature of these models is the observed algebraic time dependence of the asymptotic jamming coverage ∼t^{-ν} as t→∞. However, the exact value...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical review letters 2017-07, Vol.119 (2), p.028003-028003, Article 028003
Main Author: Baule, Adrian
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Random sequential adsorption (RSA) of particles of a particular shape is used in a large variety of contexts to model particle aggregation and jamming. A key feature of these models is the observed algebraic time dependence of the asymptotic jamming coverage ∼t^{-ν} as t→∞. However, the exact value of the exponent ν is not known apart from the simplest case of the RSA of monodisperse spheres adsorbed on a line (Renyi's seminal "car parking problem"), where ν=1 can be derived analytically. Empirical simulation studies have conjectured on a case-by-case basis that for general nonspherical particles, ν=1/(d+d[over ˜]), where d denotes the dimension of the domain, and d[over ˜] the number of orientational degrees of freedom of a particle. Here, we solve this long-standing problem analytically for the d=1 case-the "Paris car parking problem." We prove, in particular, that the scaling exponent depends on the particle shape, contrary to the original conjecture and, remarkably, falls into two universality classes: (i) ν=1/(1+d[over ˜]/2) for shapes with a smooth contact distance, e.g., ellipsoids, and (ii) ν=1/(1+d[over ˜]) for shapes with a singular contact distance, e.g., spherocylinders and polyhedra. The exact solution explains, in particular, why many empirically observed scalings fall in between these two limits.
ISSN:0031-9007
1079-7114
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.028003