Loading…

Revealing the complex genetic architecture of obsessive–compulsive disorder using meta-analysis

Two obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been published by independent OCD consortia, the International Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Foundation Genetics Collaborative (IOCDF-GC) and the OCD Collaborative Genetics Association Study (OCGAS), but many of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular psychiatry 2018-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1181-1188
Main Author: International Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Foundation Genetics Collaborative (IOCDF-GC) and OCD Collaborative Genetics Association Studies (OCGAS)
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been published by independent OCD consortia, the International Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Foundation Genetics Collaborative (IOCDF-GC) and the OCD Collaborative Genetics Association Study (OCGAS), but many of the top-ranked signals were supported in only one study. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis from the two consortia, investigating a total of 2688 individuals of European ancestry with OCD and 7037 genomically matched controls. No single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reached genome-wide significance. However, in comparison with the two individual GWASs, the distribution of P -values shifted toward significance. The top haplotypic blocks were tagged with rs4733767 ( P =7.1 × 10 −7 ; odds ratio (OR)=1.21; confidence interval (CI): 1.12–1.31, CASC8/CASC11 ), rs1030757 ( P =1.1 × 10 −6 ; OR=1.18; CI: 1.10–1.26, GRID2 ) and rs12504244 ( P =1.6 × 10 −6 ; OR=1.18; CI: 1.11–1.27, KIT ). Variants located in or near the genes ASB13 , RSPO4 , DLGAP1 , PTPRD , GRIK2 , FAIM2 and CDH20 , identified in linkage peaks and the original GWASs, were among the top signals. Polygenic risk scores for each individual study predicted case–control status in the other by explaining 0.9% ( P =0.003) and 0.3% ( P =0.0009) of the phenotypic variance in OCGAS and the European IOCDF-GC target samples, respectively. The common SNP heritability in the combined OCGAS and IOCDF-GC sample was estimated to be 0.28 (s.e.=0.04). Strikingly, ∼65% of the SNP-based heritability in the OCGAS sample was accounted for by SNPs with minor allele frequencies of ⩾40%. This joint analysis constituting the largest single OCD genome-wide study to date represents a major integrative step in elucidating the genetic causes of OCD.
ISSN:1359-4184
1476-5578
DOI:10.1038/mp.2017.154