Loading…

Chemically induced supernumerary lumbar ribs in CD-1 mice: Size distribution and dose response

Supernumerary ribs (SNR) of differing sizes are commonly observed in rodent developmental toxicity studies, and the significance of treatment‐related increases in SNR in standard studies has been contentious. We induced dose‐related increases in SNR in fetal CD‐1 mice by treating on gestation days 7...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Birth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology 2004-02, Vol.71 (1), p.17-25
Main Authors: Rogers, John M., Setzer, R. Woodrow, Branch, Stacy, Chernoff, Neil
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Supernumerary ribs (SNR) of differing sizes are commonly observed in rodent developmental toxicity studies, and the significance of treatment‐related increases in SNR in standard studies has been contentious. We induced dose‐related increases in SNR in fetal CD‐1 mice by treating on gestation days 7–8 with benomyl (BEN; 0, 75, 150 mg/kg/d), dinoseb (DIN; 0, 30, 50 mg/kg/d); 2‐methoxyethanol (2‐ME; 0, 75, 150 mg/kg/d), or valproic acid (VPA; 0, 125, 250 mg/kg/d). Incidences of SNR were 9.3–27.6% in controls and 19.3–84.4% in the high dosage groups. SNR length showed a bimodal distribution with peaks at 0.3–0.4 mm and 0.9–1.1 mm in both treated and control groups. Based on length distributions, we used an actual length of 0.6 mm to separate short (rudimentary) from long (extra) SNR. DIN, 2‐ME, and VPA induced a dose‐related increase of extra ribs, while the incidence of rudimentary ribs remained at control levels. There was no apparent correlation of the presence of either type of SNR in a fetus and the occurrence of other anomalies. These data support the idea that extra and rudimentary SNR may reflect separate developmental phenomena, and should be considered and reported separately in developmental toxicity studies for risk assessment.Birth Defects Res B 71:17–25, 2004. Published 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1542-9733
1542-9741
DOI:10.1002/bdrb.10055