Loading…
Removal of carbon and nutrients from domestic wastewater using a low investment, integrated treatment concept
An integrated chemical–physical–biological treatment concept for the low-cost treatment of domestic wastewater is proposed. Domestic wastewater was subjected to a chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT), followed by treatment in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. In addition, a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water research (Oxford) 2004-07, Vol.38 (13), p.3031-3042 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | An integrated chemical–physical–biological treatment concept for the low-cost treatment of domestic wastewater is proposed. Domestic wastewater was subjected to a chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT), followed by treatment in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. In addition, a regenerable zeolite was used to remove NH
4
+, either after CEPT pretreatment or after biological treatment in the UASB reactor. The CEPT pretreatment consisted of the addition of a coagulant (FeCl
3) and an anionic organic flocculant and removed on average 73% of the total chemical oxygen demand (COD
t), 85% of the total suspended solids, and 80% of PO
4
3− present in the wastewater. The UASB system, which consequently received a low COD
t input of approximately 140
mg/L, was operated using a volumetric loading rate of 0.4
g COD
t/L. d (hydraulic retention time [HRT]=10
h) and 0.7
g COD
t/L. d (HRT=5
h). For these conditions, the system removed about 55% of the COD
t in its influent, thus producing an effluent with a low COD
t of approximately 50
mg/L. The zeolite, when applied in batch mode before the UASB reactor, removed approximately 45% of the NH
4
+, whereas its application as a post-treatment cartridge resulted in almost 100% NH
4
+ removal. The simple design and relatively low operating costs, due to low costs of added chemicals and low energy input (estimated at € 0.07–0.1 per m
3 wastewater treated), combined with excellent treatment performance, means that this system can be used as a novel domestic wastewater treatment system for developing countries. Therefore, the system is called a Low Investment Sewage Treatment (LIST) system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.040 |