Loading…
BRCA1-like profile is not significantly associated with survival benefit of non-myeloablative intensified chemotherapy in the GAIN randomized controlled trial
Purpose The BRCA1 -like profile identifies tumors with a defect in homologous recombination due to inactivation of BRCA1. This profile has been shown to predict which stage III breast cancer patients benefit from myeloablative, DNA double-strand-break-inducing chemotherapy. We tested the predictive...
Saved in:
Published in: | Breast cancer research and treatment 2017-12, Vol.166 (3), p.775-785 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The
BRCA1
-like profile identifies tumors with a defect in homologous recombination due to inactivation of BRCA1. This profile has been shown to predict which stage III breast cancer patients benefit from myeloablative, DNA double-strand-break-inducing chemotherapy. We tested the predictive potential of the
BRCA1
-like profile for adjuvant non-myeloablative, intensified dose-dense chemotherapy in the GAIN trial.
Methods
Lymph node positive breast cancer patients were randomized to 3 × 3 dose-dense cycles of intensified epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (ETC) or 4 cycles concurrent epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 10 cycles of weekly paclitaxel combined with 4 cycles capecitabine (EC-TX). Only triple negative breast cancer patients (TNBC) for whom tissue was available were included in these planned analyses.
BRCA1
-like or non-
BRCA1
-like copy number profiles were derived from low coverage sequencing data.
Results
119 out of 163 TNBC patients (73%) had a
BRCA1
-like profile. After median follow-up of 83 months, disease free survival (DFS) was not significantly different between
BRCA1
-like and non-
BRCA1
-like patients [adjusted hazard ratio (adj.HR) 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55–1.86], neither was overall survival (OS; adj.HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.58–2.71). When split by
BRCA1
-like status, DFS and OS were not significantly different between treatments. However, EC-TX seemed to result in a trend to an improvement in DFS in patients with a
BRCA1
-like tumor, while the reverse accounted for ETC treatment in patients with a non-
BRCA1
-like tumor (
p
for interaction = 0.094).
Conclusions
The
BRCA1
-like profile is not associated with survival benefit for a non-myeloablative, intensified regimen in this study population. Considering the limited cohort size, capecitabine might have additional benefit for TNBC patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-6806 1573-7217 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10549-017-4444-9 |