Responses of an American eel brain endothelial-like cell line to selenium deprivation and to selenite, selenate, and selenomethionine additions in different exposure media

• Published in: In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal 2017-12, Vol.53 (10), p.940-953
• Main Authors: Bloch, Sophia R., Kim, John J., Pham, Phuc H., Hodson, Peter V., Lee, Lucy E. J., Bols, Niels C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anguilla rostrata; Animal Genetics and Genomics; Apoptosis; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Brain; Brain cancer; CELL AND TISSUE MODELS; Cell Biology; Cell Culture; Cell growth; Cell migration; Cell proliferation; Cytotoxicity; Deprivation; Developmental Biology; Endothelial cells; Exposure; Galactose; Life Sciences; Mammals; Media; Pyruvic acid; Selenite; Selenium; Selenium compounds; Selenomethionine; Serum-free medium; Stem Cells; Toxicity
• ISSN: 1071-2690; 1543-706X
• DOI: 10.1007/s11626-017-0196-4

The effect of selenium deprivation and addition on the American eel brain endothelial cell line (eelB) was studied in three exposure media: complete growth medium (L15/FBS), serum-free medium (L15), and minimal medium (L15/ex). L15/ex contains only galactose and pyruvate and allowed the deprivation of selenium on cells to be studied. In L15/ex, without any obvious source of selenium, eelB cells survived for at least 7 d, formed capillary-like structures (CLS) on Matrigel, and migrated to heal wounds. Three selenium compounds were added to cultures: selenite, selenate, and selenomethionine (SeMet). Adding selenite or selenate to eelB cell cultures for 24 h caused dose-dependent declines in cell viability, regardless of the exposure media. Although varying with exposure media and viability end point, selenite was approximately 70-fold more cytotoxic than selenate. By contrast, 24 h exposures to either DL- or L-SeMet in the three media caused little or no cytotoxicity. However for 7 d exposures in L15/ex, DL- and L-SeMet were very cytotoxic, even at the lowest tested concentration of 31 μM. By contrast in L15 and L15/FBS, cytotoxicity was only observed with 500 and 1000 μM L-SeMet. In L15/FBS, eelB continued to migrate and form CLS in the presence of SeMet but at 500 μM, cell migration appeared stimulated. As judged from a colony-forming assay over 14 d in L15/FBS, 500 and 1000 μM DL- and L-SeMet inhibited cell proliferation. Overall, the responses of eel cells to selenium depended on the selenium form, concentration, and exposure media, with responses to SeMet being most dependent on exposure media.