Loading…

Assessments of Carotid Artery Plaque Burden in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Although both carotid intima–media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque score (cPS) determined by carotid ultrasonography reflect the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, there are few reports on direct comparisons of their clinical utilities in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2017-12, Vol.120 (11), p.1955-1960
Main Authors: Tada, Hayato, Kawashiri, Masa-aki, Okada, Hirofumi, Nakahashi, Takuya, Sakata, Kenji, Nohara, Atsushi, Inazu, Akihiro, Mabuchi, Hiroshi, Yamagishi, Masakazu, Hayashi, Kenshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although both carotid intima–media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque score (cPS) determined by carotid ultrasonography reflect the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, there are few reports on direct comparisons of their clinical utilities in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We aimed (1) to compare the clinical utilities of these measurements and (2) to estimate the onset and progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with FH. We examined 225 patients with FH (126 males; mean age, 51 ± 18 years) who underwent carotid ultrasonography. We assessed baseline characteristics including lipid levels, other traditional risk factors, and the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as mean cIMT and cPS. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that cPS was significantly associated with CAD (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–1.37, p = 0.00036), whereas cIMT was not (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.15 to 11.76, p = 0.84). Adding cPS information to other traditional risk factors improved the risk discrimination of CAD (C-index 0.887 vs 0.909, p = 0.030), whereas adding cIMT information did not (C-index 0.887 vs 0.893, p = 0.33). Regression equations were Y = 0.219X − 3.74 (r = 0.65, p 
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.08.012