Loading…
Assessments of Carotid Artery Plaque Burden in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Although both carotid intima–media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque score (cPS) determined by carotid ultrasonography reflect the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, there are few reports on direct comparisons of their clinical utilities in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We a...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of cardiology 2017-12, Vol.120 (11), p.1955-1960 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Although both carotid intima–media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque score (cPS) determined by carotid ultrasonography reflect the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, there are few reports on direct comparisons of their clinical utilities in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We aimed (1) to compare the clinical utilities of these measurements and (2) to estimate the onset and progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with FH. We examined 225 patients with FH (126 males; mean age, 51 ± 18 years) who underwent carotid ultrasonography. We assessed baseline characteristics including lipid levels, other traditional risk factors, and the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as mean cIMT and cPS. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that cPS was significantly associated with CAD (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–1.37, p = 0.00036), whereas cIMT was not (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.15 to 11.76, p = 0.84). Adding cPS information to other traditional risk factors improved the risk discrimination of CAD (C-index 0.887 vs 0.909, p = 0.030), whereas adding cIMT information did not (C-index 0.887 vs 0.893, p = 0.33). Regression equations were Y = 0.219X − 3.74 (r = 0.65, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.08.012 |