Loading…

A clinical trial of prime-boost immunisation with the candidate malaria vaccines RTS,S/AS02A and MVA-CS

Heterologous prime-boost immunisation with RTS,S/AS02A and the poxvirus MVA-CS was evaluated in 18 healthy malaria-naïve subjects in Oxford. Both priming with RTS,S and boosting MVA-CS, and the reverse, were found to be safe and well tolerated. T cell responses as measured by IFN-γ ex vivo ELISPOT w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2006-04, Vol.24 (15), p.2850-2859
Main Authors: Dunachie, Susanna J., Walther, Michael, Vuola, Jenni M., Webster, Daniel P., Keating, Sheila M., Berthoud, Tamara, Andrews, Laura, Bejon, Philip, Poulton, Ian, Butcher, Geoffrey, Watkins, Katherine, Sinden, Robert E., Leach, Amanda, Moris, Philippe, Tornieporth, Nadia, Schneider, Joerg, Dubovsky, Filip, Tierney, Eveline, Williams, Jack, Gray Heppner, D., Gilbert, Sarah C., Cohen, Joe, Hill, Adrian V.S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Heterologous prime-boost immunisation with RTS,S/AS02A and the poxvirus MVA-CS was evaluated in 18 healthy malaria-naïve subjects in Oxford. Both priming with RTS,S and boosting MVA-CS, and the reverse, were found to be safe and well tolerated. T cell responses as measured by IFN-γ ex vivo ELISPOT were induced, but the responses were low to moderate in both groups, with heterologous boosting yielding only small increments in T cell immunogenicity and no increased antibody response. Protection against 3D7 Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite challenge 4 weeks after the final vaccination was equal for both regimens at 33% (95% C.I. 4.3–77.7%), with one subject remaining fully protected on rechallenge at 5 months.
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.12.041