Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations: Results V: Sacral Nerve Stimulation

• Published in: Colorectal disease 2017-09, Vol.19 Suppl 3 (S3), p.92-100
• Main Authors: Pilkington, S A, Emmett, C, Knowles, C H, Mason, J, Yiannakou, Y
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Chronic Disease; Constipation - physiopathology; Constipation - surgery; Constipation - therapy; Device Removal; Electric Stimulation Therapy - adverse effects; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods; Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects; Humans; Lumbosacral Plexus; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1462-8910; 1463-1318
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.13780

To assess the outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation in adults with chronic constipation. Standardised methods and reporting of benefits and harms were used for all CapaCiTY reviews that closely adhered to PRISMA 2016 guidance. Main conclusions were presented as summary evidence statements with a summative Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2009) level. Seven articles were identified, providing data on outcomes in 375 patients. Length of procedures and length of stay was not reported. Data on harms were inconsistently reported and heterogeneous, making estimates of harm tentative and imprecise. Morbidity rates ranged between 13 and 34%, with overall device removal rate between 8 and 23%. Although inconsistently reported, pooled treatment success was typically 57-87% for patients receiving permanent implants, although there was significant variation between studies. Patient selection was inconsistently documented. No conclusions could be drawn regarding particular phenotypes that responded favourably or unfavourably to sacral nerve stimulation. Evidence supporting sacral nerve stimulation is derived from poor quality studies. Three methodologically robust trials are have reported since this review and all have all urged greater caution.