Differential responses of amphibians and reptiles in riparian and stream habitats to land use disturbances in western Georgia, USA

• Published in: Biological conservation 2008-09, Vol.141 (9), p.2290-2300
• Main Authors: Barrett, Kyle, Guyer, Craig
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: agricultural land; Amphibia. Reptilia; Amphibian decline; amphibians; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; anthropogenic activities; Anura; Applied ecology; Biological and medical sciences; canopy; Caudata; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; frogs; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; grazing; land use; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking; Pasture; pastures; population dynamics; Reptile diversity; reptiles; Riparian; riparian areas; salamanders and newts; Species accumulation; species diversity; streams; urban areas; Urbanization; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution; watersheds; wildlife habitats
• ISSN: 0006-3207; 1873-2917
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.019

Urban and agricultural land uses have caused documented declines in diversity of many organisms. However, responses of stream- and riparian-dwelling amphibians and reptiles to anthropogenic land development are collectively understudied and, when studied, are often grouped together as though these two taxa respond in a similar fashion. We surveyed watersheds in four land use categories (reference, pasture, developing, and urban) for amphibian and reptile species richness over a two-year period in the southeastern United States. Total herpetofauna species richness was equivalent among all watershed types, but amphibians and reptiles responded differently to urbanization when analyzed separately. Urban watersheds had significantly fewer amphibian species than all other watershed types, but these losses were counterbalanced by significant increases in reptile species richness in these same watersheds. We also found that local, riparian-scale, habitat differences were strongly correlated with species composition differences between pasture and developing watersheds. While the difference in species composition between pasture and developing sites may have multiple, species-specific explanations, the dramatic differences between amphibian and reptile species richness in urban watersheds suggest broad trends that may be important to conservation planning. Specifically, our observations suggest that urbanization in the studied watersheds alters small streams from closed-canopy, shallow-water features of the forested landscape likely present before settlement by Europeans and favored by many salamanders and frogs to features associated with open vegetation and deeper, warmer waters favored by riverine turtles and snakes. We conclude that amphibians and reptiles, despite some physiological similarities, are not equivalent for monitoring purposes. Additionally, if future development in the Piedmont mirrors current urbanization, then significant faunal shifts seem assured.