In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices

National Institutes of Health principal investigators reported their perceptions of the ethical defensibility, prevalence in their field, and their personal willingness to engage in questionable research practices (QRPs). Using ethical defensibility ratings, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of empirical research on human research ethics 2018-02, Vol.13 (1), p.101-110
Main Authors: Sacco, Donald F., Bruton, Samuel V., Brown, Mitch
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acceptability
Achievement
Ambiguity
Beliefs
Educational programs
Educational research
Ethics
Ethics, Research
Exploratory factor analysis
Factor analysis
Funding
Grants
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Institutes
Medical research
Motivation
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Perceptions
Prevalence
Protective factors
Research Design
Research ethics
Research Personnel - ethics
Research Personnel - psychology
Research Support as Topic
Responsible Conduct of Research and Research Integrity
Risk
Scientific Misconduct
Social Norms
Social Responsibility
Uncertainty
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!