Loading…
Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study
Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on...
Saved in:
Published in: | Lasers in medical science 2018-05, Vol.33 (4), p.737-744 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33 |
container_end_page | 744 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 737 |
container_title | Lasers in medical science |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis Amorim, César Ferreira Fumagalli, Marco Antônio Politti, Fabiano |
description | Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS
G
) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups (
F
= 0.72
p
= 0.39,
η
p
2
= 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS
G
between the LLLT and pLLLT (
F
1,2
= 16.66;
P
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1973020339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1972120888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6AG4k4MaF0fx1VcWdDOOMMIMbBXdFKrllp0lVyvyM9Lygr2V6ahQRXIVLvnPuuRyEnjP6hlHavk2MMioIZS3hkkrSPEAbJsWWNFR-fYg2lDcd6RRnJ-hJSntawYaJx-iEK06lYnKDfl6XZDzg0Q0QsQmzLSa7MOMb8MG4fMB6tvj8-gLrafEuFws4jDjvAJdlqZIc9QK3riQ8rU5uxjvQPu8OOJVhDyYnrMdcUR9-EA_VGHud6uxi1Nbp47p3WONYN4XJ3YJ9jW0ogwcyeDfXafHawBBIjZdj8P5ImBhSCjfVJtVQh6fo0ah9gmf37yn68uH889klufp08fHs_RUxouWZbLVSLRhjqeistFw1nDW0U7LRHTeKNwLs1lA5SmWZbIUdDbSaQiNGsO0gxCl6tfouMXwvkHI_uWTAez1DKKlnqhWUUyFURV_-g-5DiXNNd6Q447Trukqxlbo7KMLYL9FNOh56Rvtjy_3acl_L648t903VvLh3LsME9o_id60V4CuQ6tf8DeJfq__r-gtZkraB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1972120888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana ; de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo ; Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida ; Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo ; de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis ; Amorim, César Ferreira ; Fumagalli, Marco Antônio ; Politti, Fabiano</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana ; de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo ; Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida ; Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo ; de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis ; Amorim, César Ferreira ; Fumagalli, Marco Antônio ; Politti, Fabiano</creatorcontrib><description>Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS
G
) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups (
F
= 0.72
p
= 0.39,
η
p
2
= 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS
G
between the LLLT and pLLLT (
F
1,2
= 16.66;
P
< 0.0001,
η
p
2
= 0.09). Individuals who received active LLLT presented a significant decrease in RMS
G
after laser application (
F
= 61.28;
p
< 0.0001,
η
p
2
= 0.43). In conclusion, the 820 nm LLLT, with energy total of 18 J, did not alter the MFCV but significantly reduced the sEMG signal amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects to a level of up to 30% of maximal voluntary contraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-8921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-604X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29204914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - radiation effects ; Cross-Over Studies ; Dentistry ; Double-Blind Method ; Double-blind studies ; Electromyography ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Irradiation ; Laser applications ; Lasers ; Levels ; Low-Level Light Therapy - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - radiation effects ; Muscles ; Neck ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Article ; Pain ; Photonics ; Placebos ; Quantum Optics ; Randomization ; Shoulder ; Trapezius muscle ; Velocity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Lasers in medical science, 2018-05, Vol.33 (4), p.737-744</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Lasers in Medical Science is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amorim, César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fumagalli, Marco Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politti, Fabiano</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study</title><title>Lasers in medical science</title><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><description>Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS
G
) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups (
F
= 0.72
p
= 0.39,
η
p
2
= 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS
G
between the LLLT and pLLLT (
F
1,2
= 16.66;
P
< 0.0001,
η
p
2
= 0.09). Individuals who received active LLLT presented a significant decrease in RMS
G
after laser application (
F
= 61.28;
p
< 0.0001,
η
p
2
= 0.43). In conclusion, the 820 nm LLLT, with energy total of 18 J, did not alter the MFCV but significantly reduced the sEMG signal amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects to a level of up to 30% of maximal voluntary contraction.</description><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Laser applications</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Low-Level Light Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - radiation effects</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Quantum Optics</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Trapezius muscle</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0268-8921</issn><issn>1435-604X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6AG4k4MaF0fx1VcWdDOOMMIMbBXdFKrllp0lVyvyM9Lygr2V6ahQRXIVLvnPuuRyEnjP6hlHavk2MMioIZS3hkkrSPEAbJsWWNFR-fYg2lDcd6RRnJ-hJSntawYaJx-iEK06lYnKDfl6XZDzg0Q0QsQmzLSa7MOMb8MG4fMB6tvj8-gLrafEuFws4jDjvAJdlqZIc9QK3riQ8rU5uxjvQPu8OOJVhDyYnrMdcUR9-EA_VGHud6uxi1Nbp47p3WONYN4XJ3YJ9jW0ogwcyeDfXafHawBBIjZdj8P5ImBhSCjfVJtVQh6fo0ah9gmf37yn68uH889klufp08fHs_RUxouWZbLVSLRhjqeistFw1nDW0U7LRHTeKNwLs1lA5SmWZbIUdDbSaQiNGsO0gxCl6tfouMXwvkHI_uWTAez1DKKlnqhWUUyFURV_-g-5DiXNNd6Q447Trukqxlbo7KMLYL9FNOh56Rvtjy_3acl_L648t903VvLh3LsME9o_id60V4CuQ6tf8DeJfq__r-gtZkraB</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana</creator><creator>de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo</creator><creator>Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida</creator><creator>Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo</creator><creator>de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis</creator><creator>Amorim, César Ferreira</creator><creator>Fumagalli, Marco Antônio</creator><creator>Politti, Fabiano</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study</title><author>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana ; de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo ; Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida ; Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo ; de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis ; Amorim, César Ferreira ; Fumagalli, Marco Antônio ; Politti, Fabiano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Laser applications</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Low-Level Light Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - radiation effects</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Quantum Optics</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Trapezius muscle</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amorim, César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fumagalli, Marco Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politti, Fabiano</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana</au><au>de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo</au><au>Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida</au><au>Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo</au><au>de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis</au><au>Amorim, César Ferreira</au><au>Fumagalli, Marco Antônio</au><au>Politti, Fabiano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle><stitle>Lasers Med Sci</stitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>737</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>737-744</pages><issn>0268-8921</issn><eissn>1435-604X</eissn><abstract>Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS
G
) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups (
F
= 0.72
p
= 0.39,
η
p
2
= 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS
G
between the LLLT and pLLLT (
F
1,2
= 16.66;
P
< 0.0001,
η
p
2
= 0.09). Individuals who received active LLLT presented a significant decrease in RMS
G
after laser application (
F
= 61.28;
p
< 0.0001,
η
p
2
= 0.43). In conclusion, the 820 nm LLLT, with energy total of 18 J, did not alter the MFCV but significantly reduced the sEMG signal amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects to a level of up to 30% of maximal voluntary contraction.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>29204914</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-8921 |
ispartof | Lasers in medical science, 2018-05, Vol.33 (4), p.737-744 |
issn | 0268-8921 1435-604X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1973020339 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Cervical Vertebrae - radiation effects Cross-Over Studies Dentistry Double-Blind Method Double-blind studies Electromyography Female Healthy Volunteers Humans Irradiation Laser applications Lasers Levels Low-Level Light Therapy - methods Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - radiation effects Muscles Neck Optical Devices Optics Original Article Pain Photonics Placebos Quantum Optics Randomization Shoulder Trapezius muscle Velocity Young Adult |
title | Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%20fiber%20conduction%20velocity%20and%20EMG%20amplitude%20of%20the%20upper%20trapezius%20muscle%20in%20healthy%20subjects%20after%20low-level%20laser%20irradiation:%20a%20randomized,%20double-blind,%20placebo-controlled,%20crossover%20study&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20medical%20science&rft.au=Sarilho%20de%20Mendon%C3%A7a,%20Fabiana&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=737&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=737-744&rft.issn=0268-8921&rft.eissn=1435-604X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1972120888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1972120888&rft_id=info:pmid/29204914&rfr_iscdi=true |