Loading…

Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study

Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lasers in medical science 2018-05, Vol.33 (4), p.737-744
Main Authors: Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana, de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo, Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida, Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo, de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis, Amorim, César Ferreira, Fumagalli, Marco Antônio, Politti, Fabiano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33
container_end_page 744
container_issue 4
container_start_page 737
container_title Lasers in medical science
container_volume 33
creator Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana
de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo
Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida
Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo
de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis
Amorim, César Ferreira
Fumagalli, Marco Antônio
Politti, Fabiano
description Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS G ) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups ( F  = 0.72 p  = 0.39, η p 2  = 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS G between the LLLT and pLLLT ( F 1,2  = 16.66; P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1973020339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1972120888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6AG4k4MaF0fx1VcWdDOOMMIMbBXdFKrllp0lVyvyM9Lygr2V6ahQRXIVLvnPuuRyEnjP6hlHavk2MMioIZS3hkkrSPEAbJsWWNFR-fYg2lDcd6RRnJ-hJSntawYaJx-iEK06lYnKDfl6XZDzg0Q0QsQmzLSa7MOMb8MG4fMB6tvj8-gLrafEuFws4jDjvAJdlqZIc9QK3riQ8rU5uxjvQPu8OOJVhDyYnrMdcUR9-EA_VGHud6uxi1Nbp47p3WONYN4XJ3YJ9jW0ogwcyeDfXafHawBBIjZdj8P5ImBhSCjfVJtVQh6fo0ah9gmf37yn68uH889klufp08fHs_RUxouWZbLVSLRhjqeistFw1nDW0U7LRHTeKNwLs1lA5SmWZbIUdDbSaQiNGsO0gxCl6tfouMXwvkHI_uWTAez1DKKlnqhWUUyFURV_-g-5DiXNNd6Q447Trukqxlbo7KMLYL9FNOh56Rvtjy_3acl_L648t903VvLh3LsME9o_id60V4CuQ6tf8DeJfq__r-gtZkraB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1972120888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana ; de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo ; Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida ; Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo ; de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis ; Amorim, César Ferreira ; Fumagalli, Marco Antônio ; Politti, Fabiano</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana ; de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo ; Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida ; Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo ; de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis ; Amorim, César Ferreira ; Fumagalli, Marco Antônio ; Politti, Fabiano</creatorcontrib><description>Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS G ) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups ( F  = 0.72 p  = 0.39, η p 2  = 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS G between the LLLT and pLLLT ( F 1,2  = 16.66; P  &lt; 0.0001, η p 2  = 0.09). Individuals who received active LLLT presented a significant decrease in RMS G after laser application ( F  = 61.28; p  &lt; 0.0001, η p 2  = 0.43). In conclusion, the 820 nm LLLT, with energy total of 18 J, did not alter the MFCV but significantly reduced the sEMG signal amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects to a level of up to 30% of maximal voluntary contraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-8921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-604X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29204914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - radiation effects ; Cross-Over Studies ; Dentistry ; Double-Blind Method ; Double-blind studies ; Electromyography ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Irradiation ; Laser applications ; Lasers ; Levels ; Low-Level Light Therapy - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - radiation effects ; Muscles ; Neck ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Article ; Pain ; Photonics ; Placebos ; Quantum Optics ; Randomization ; Shoulder ; Trapezius muscle ; Velocity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Lasers in medical science, 2018-05, Vol.33 (4), p.737-744</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Lasers in Medical Science is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amorim, César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fumagalli, Marco Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politti, Fabiano</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study</title><title>Lasers in medical science</title><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><description>Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS G ) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups ( F  = 0.72 p  = 0.39, η p 2  = 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS G between the LLLT and pLLLT ( F 1,2  = 16.66; P  &lt; 0.0001, η p 2  = 0.09). Individuals who received active LLLT presented a significant decrease in RMS G after laser application ( F  = 61.28; p  &lt; 0.0001, η p 2  = 0.43). In conclusion, the 820 nm LLLT, with energy total of 18 J, did not alter the MFCV but significantly reduced the sEMG signal amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects to a level of up to 30% of maximal voluntary contraction.</description><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Laser applications</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Low-Level Light Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - radiation effects</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Quantum Optics</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Trapezius muscle</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0268-8921</issn><issn>1435-604X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6AG4k4MaF0fx1VcWdDOOMMIMbBXdFKrllp0lVyvyM9Lygr2V6ahQRXIVLvnPuuRyEnjP6hlHavk2MMioIZS3hkkrSPEAbJsWWNFR-fYg2lDcd6RRnJ-hJSntawYaJx-iEK06lYnKDfl6XZDzg0Q0QsQmzLSa7MOMb8MG4fMB6tvj8-gLrafEuFws4jDjvAJdlqZIc9QK3riQ8rU5uxjvQPu8OOJVhDyYnrMdcUR9-EA_VGHud6uxi1Nbp47p3WONYN4XJ3YJ9jW0ogwcyeDfXafHawBBIjZdj8P5ImBhSCjfVJtVQh6fo0ah9gmf37yn68uH889klufp08fHs_RUxouWZbLVSLRhjqeistFw1nDW0U7LRHTeKNwLs1lA5SmWZbIUdDbSaQiNGsO0gxCl6tfouMXwvkHI_uWTAez1DKKlnqhWUUyFURV_-g-5DiXNNd6Q447Trukqxlbo7KMLYL9FNOh56Rvtjy_3acl_L648t903VvLh3LsME9o_id60V4CuQ6tf8DeJfq__r-gtZkraB</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana</creator><creator>de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo</creator><creator>Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida</creator><creator>Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo</creator><creator>de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis</creator><creator>Amorim, César Ferreira</creator><creator>Fumagalli, Marco Antônio</creator><creator>Politti, Fabiano</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study</title><author>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana ; de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo ; Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida ; Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo ; de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis ; Amorim, César Ferreira ; Fumagalli, Marco Antônio ; Politti, Fabiano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Laser applications</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Low-Level Light Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - radiation effects</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Quantum Optics</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Trapezius muscle</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amorim, César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fumagalli, Marco Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politti, Fabiano</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana</au><au>de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo</au><au>Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida</au><au>Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo</au><au>de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis</au><au>Amorim, César Ferreira</au><au>Fumagalli, Marco Antônio</au><au>Politti, Fabiano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle><stitle>Lasers Med Sci</stitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>737</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>737-744</pages><issn>0268-8921</issn><eissn>1435-604X</eissn><abstract>Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS G ) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups ( F  = 0.72 p  = 0.39, η p 2  = 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS G between the LLLT and pLLLT ( F 1,2  = 16.66; P  &lt; 0.0001, η p 2  = 0.09). Individuals who received active LLLT presented a significant decrease in RMS G after laser application ( F  = 61.28; p  &lt; 0.0001, η p 2  = 0.43). In conclusion, the 820 nm LLLT, with energy total of 18 J, did not alter the MFCV but significantly reduced the sEMG signal amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects to a level of up to 30% of maximal voluntary contraction.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>29204914</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-8921
ispartof Lasers in medical science, 2018-05, Vol.33 (4), p.737-744
issn 0268-8921
1435-604X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1973020339
source Springer Nature
subjects Cervical Vertebrae - radiation effects
Cross-Over Studies
Dentistry
Double-Blind Method
Double-blind studies
Electromyography
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Irradiation
Laser applications
Lasers
Levels
Low-Level Light Therapy - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology
Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - radiation effects
Muscles
Neck
Optical Devices
Optics
Original Article
Pain
Photonics
Placebos
Quantum Optics
Randomization
Shoulder
Trapezius muscle
Velocity
Young Adult
title Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%20fiber%20conduction%20velocity%20and%20EMG%20amplitude%20of%20the%20upper%20trapezius%20muscle%20in%20healthy%20subjects%20after%20low-level%20laser%20irradiation:%20a%20randomized,%20double-blind,%20placebo-controlled,%20crossover%20study&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20medical%20science&rft.au=Sarilho%20de%20Mendon%C3%A7a,%20Fabiana&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=737&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=737-744&rft.issn=0268-8921&rft.eissn=1435-604X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1972120888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a997eccd038d4d29621608946a82c9263ed5c04f49d1473dfce7a0e63fed7b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1972120888&rft_id=info:pmid/29204914&rfr_iscdi=true