Loading…

Evaluation of the delta neutrophil index from an automated blood cell analyser in septic dogs

•The delta neutrophil index (DNI) is a potential marker for canine sepsis.•The DNI appears to have value in predicting septic shock in dogs.•The DNI is correlated with the presence of immature and toxic neutrophils evaluated on blood smears in dogs with sepsis. Immature granulocytes (IG) are a marke...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The veterinary journal (1997) 2017-12, Vol.230, p.13-19
Main Authors: Troìa, R., Agnoli, C., Calipa, S., Segalina, S., Murgia, E., Gruarin, M., Dondi, F., Giunti, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The delta neutrophil index (DNI) is a potential marker for canine sepsis.•The DNI appears to have value in predicting septic shock in dogs.•The DNI is correlated with the presence of immature and toxic neutrophils evaluated on blood smears in dogs with sepsis. Immature granulocytes (IG) are a marker of severe inflammatory states in human beings and animals, and have been linked to a diagnosis of sepsis and poor prognosis. The delta neutrophil index (DNI), automatically calculated by a haematological analyser, provides an estimate of circulating IG. In particular, an increased DNI value has been associated with the severity of sepsis, and mortality, in critically ill human beings. The aims of this study were to determine the DNI reference interval (RI) in healthy dogs, and to evaluate its diagnostic and prognostic significance in dogs with sepsis. A total of 118 dogs with sepsis undergoing a complete blood cell count (CBC) at the time of hospital admission were included retrospectively. Dogs with sepsis were compared to 20 dogs with primary immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia (IMHA) and 99 healthy controls. The DNI RI was set from 0 to 9.2%. The DNI was significantly higher in dogs with sepsis compared to dogs with IMHA and healthy dogs (P
ISSN:1090-0233
1532-2971
DOI:10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.11.002