The evaluation of smaller plasterboards on productivity, work demands and workload in construction workers

• Published in: Applied ergonomics 2007-09, Vol.38 (5), p.681-686
• Main Authors: van der Molen, Henk F., Mol, Eric, Kuijer, P. Paul F.M., Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Applied physiology; Biological and medical sciences; Blue collar workers; Construction; Construction Materials; Construction work; Efficiency; Ergonomics; Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology; Facility Design and Construction; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology; Humans; Intervention; Manual materials handling; Materials handling; Medical sciences; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Musculoskeletal Diseases - prevention & control; Occupational Exposure; Quality of work
• ISSN: 0003-6870; 1872-9126
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06.007

Manual handling of plasterboards in order to construct interior building walls is a risk factor for musculoskeletal complaints. Unfortunately, mechanical lifting aids to reduce the physical workload are impractical for this task. Therefore, the effect of smaller plasterboards on productivity, work demands and workload was evaluated in an exploratory study among experienced construction workers ( n=4–8) at the worksite. The dimensions and weight of the conventional and smaller plasterboards (PB) were: PB120 (2440×1200×15 mm; 33 kg) and PB90 (2440×900×12.5 mm; 20 kg), respectively. Productivity was defined as meters of plasterboard mounted. Work demands were assessed by means of real time observations of tasks and activities. Workload was determined using continuous heart rate monitoring and subjective judgments of perceived workload. Productivity and total work time per working day did not differ between PB120 and PB90. Duration of mounting (29% increase) and anchoring (26% increase) were longer for PB90 than PB120. Duration of lifting, carrying and turning over plasterboards, and percentage of heart rate reserve showed no difference between PB120 and PB90. A majority of the workers preferred PB90. For the last two reasons and because PB90 weighs approximately 40% less than PB120, PB90 seems preferable. The workload in both conditions, however, was considered high.