Loading…
Performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T for early assessment of tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy
Purpose The purpose of the article is to determine whether changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) obtained 2 weeks after the beginning of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) allow to predict treatment response and whether correlate with tumor histopa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Abdominal imaging 2018-09, Vol.43 (9), p.2221-2230 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The purpose of the article is to determine whether changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) obtained 2 weeks after the beginning of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) allow to predict treatment response and whether correlate with tumor histopathologic response.
Methods
Forty-three patients receiving CRT for LARC and 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted sequences before treatment, 2 weeks during, and 8 weeks post the completion of CRT were included. ADC values were calculated at each time point and percentage of ADC changes at 2 weeks (ΔADC during) and 8 weeks (ΔADC post) were assessed. Data were correlated to surgical results and histopathologic tumor regression grade (TRG), according to Mandard’s classification. ADC values and ΔADCs of complete responders (CR; TRG1) and non-complete responders (non-CR; TRG 2-5) were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess diagnostic accuracy of ΔADC for differentiating CR from non-CR. The correlation with TRG was investigated using Spearman's rank test.
Results
ΔADC during and ΔADC post were significantly higher in CR (33.9% and 57%, respectively) compared to non-CR (13.5% and 2.2%, respectively) group (
p
= 0.006 and
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-018-1457-8 |