Validation of flow cytometric analysis of platelet function in patients with a suspected platelet function defect

• Published in: Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2018-04, Vol.16 (4), p.689-698
• Main Authors: van Asten, I., Schutgens, R. E. G., Baaij, M., Zandstra, J., Roest, M., Pasterkamp, G., Huisman, A., Korporaal, S. J. A., Urbanus, R. T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bleeding; blood platelet disorders; Blood Platelet Disorders - blood; Blood Platelet Disorders - diagnosis; blood platelets; Blood Platelets - metabolism; Cross-Sectional Studies; Fibrinogen; Fibrinogen - metabolism; Flow Cytometry; Humans; P-Selectin - blood; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; platelet function tests; Platelet Function Tests - methods; Platelets; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results
• ISSN: 1538-7933; 1538-7836; 1538-7836
• DOI: 10.1111/jth.13952

Essentials The diagnosis of mild platelet function disorders (PFDs) is challenging. Validation of flow cytometric testing in patients with suspected PFDs is required. Flow cytometry has added value to light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in diagnosis of PFDs. There is fair agreement in diagnosing PFDs between LTA and flow cytometry. Summary Background Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is the most commonly used test for the diagnosis of platelet function disorders (PFDs), but has moderate sensitivity for mild PFDs. Flow cytometry has been recommended for additional diagnostics of PFDs but is not yet standardized as a diagnostic test. We developed a standardized protocol for flow cytometric analysis of platelet function that measures fibrinogen binding and P‐selectin expression as platelet activation markers in response to agonist stimulation. Objectives To determine the additional value of flow cytometric platelet function testing to standard LTA screening in a cross‐sectional cohort of patients with a suspected PFD. Methods Platelet function was assessed with flow cytometry and LTA in 107 patients suspected of a PFD in whom von Willebrand disease and coagulation factor deficiencies were excluded. Both tests were compared in terms of agreement and discriminative ability for diagnosing patients with PFDs. Results Out of 107 patients, 51 patients had an elevated bleeding score; 62.7% of the patients had abnormal platelet function measured with flow cytometry and 54.2% of the patients were abnormal based on LTA. There was fair agreement between LTA and flow cytometry (κ = 0.32). The discriminative ability of flow cytometric analysis in patients with an elevated bleeding score was good (AUC 0.82, 0.74–0.90), but moderate for LTA (AUC 0.70, 0.60–0.80). Both tests combined had a better discriminative ability (AUC 0.87, 0.80–0.94). Conclusion Flow cytometric analysis of platelet function has added value in diagnostics of PFDs in patients with unexplained bleeding tendency.