Loading…

The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on neural tube development in an early chicken embryo model

Purpose We aimed to determine whether varying the magnetic field during magnetic resonance imaging would affect the development of chicken embryos and neural tube defects. Methods Following incubation for 24 h, we exposed chicken embryos to varying magnetic fields for 10 min to assess the impact on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Child's nervous system 2018-05, Vol.34 (5), p.933-938
Main Authors: Kantarcioglu, Emrah, Kahilogullari, Gokmen, Zaimoglu, Murat, Atmis, Esin Ozlem, Peker, Elif, Yigman, Zeynep, Billur, Deniz, Aydin, Sevim, Erden, Ilhan Memet, Unlü, Agahan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d4a3bee425b9dbb774fbf28d86d8263cb7891f6718cd996bcfd17f5bd845d62d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d4a3bee425b9dbb774fbf28d86d8263cb7891f6718cd996bcfd17f5bd845d62d3
container_end_page 938
container_issue 5
container_start_page 933
container_title Child's nervous system
container_volume 34
creator Kantarcioglu, Emrah
Kahilogullari, Gokmen
Zaimoglu, Murat
Atmis, Esin Ozlem
Peker, Elif
Yigman, Zeynep
Billur, Deniz
Aydin, Sevim
Erden, Ilhan Memet
Unlü, Agahan
description Purpose We aimed to determine whether varying the magnetic field during magnetic resonance imaging would affect the development of chicken embryos and neural tube defects. Methods Following incubation for 24 h, we exposed chicken embryos to varying magnetic fields for 10 min to assess the impact on development. Three magnetic resonance imaging devices were used, and the eggs were divided into four groups: group 1 is exposed to 1 T, group 2 is exposed to 1.5 T, group 3 is exposed to 3 T, and group 4, control group, was not exposed to magnetic field. After MRI exposure, all embryos were again put inside incubator to complete 48 h. “The new technique” was used to open eggs, a stereomicroscope was used for the examination of magnified external morphology, and each embryo was examined according to the Hamburger and Hamilton chicken embryo stages. Embryos who had delayed stages of development are considered growth retarded. Growth retardation criteria do not include small for stage. Results Compared with embryos not exposed to a magnetic field, there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of neural tube closure defects and growth retardation in the embryos exposed to magnetic fields ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00381-018-3734-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993996456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993996456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d4a3bee425b9dbb774fbf28d86d8263cb7891f6718cd996bcfd17f5bd845d62d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPxDAQhC0EguPgB9AglzQBv5LYJUK8JCSao7Zie30EEvuwE6T79xgdUFKtdndmpPkQOqPkkhLSXmVCuKQVobLiLReV2kMLKjivCK_JPloQVjdVSwQ5Qsc5vxFCa8nUITpiiismGF0gt3oFDN6DnXD0eOzWAabe4gQ5hi5YwH259WGNY8AB5tQNeJoNYAefMMTNCGHCfcBdwNClYYvta2_foWyjSduIx-hgOEEHvhsynP7MJXq5u13dPFRPz_ePN9dPleVCTJUTHTcAgtVGOWPaVnjjmXSycZI13JpWKuqblkrrlGqM9Y62vjZOito1zPElutjlblL8mCFPeuyzhWHoAsQ5a6pKb9WIuilSupPaFHNO4PUmlaZpqynR33D1Dq4ucPU3XK2K5_wnfjYjuD_HL80iYDtBLq-whqTf4pxCqfxP6hcZ94X-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993996456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on neural tube development in an early chicken embryo model</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kantarcioglu, Emrah ; Kahilogullari, Gokmen ; Zaimoglu, Murat ; Atmis, Esin Ozlem ; Peker, Elif ; Yigman, Zeynep ; Billur, Deniz ; Aydin, Sevim ; Erden, Ilhan Memet ; Unlü, Agahan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kantarcioglu, Emrah ; Kahilogullari, Gokmen ; Zaimoglu, Murat ; Atmis, Esin Ozlem ; Peker, Elif ; Yigman, Zeynep ; Billur, Deniz ; Aydin, Sevim ; Erden, Ilhan Memet ; Unlü, Agahan</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose We aimed to determine whether varying the magnetic field during magnetic resonance imaging would affect the development of chicken embryos and neural tube defects. Methods Following incubation for 24 h, we exposed chicken embryos to varying magnetic fields for 10 min to assess the impact on development. Three magnetic resonance imaging devices were used, and the eggs were divided into four groups: group 1 is exposed to 1 T, group 2 is exposed to 1.5 T, group 3 is exposed to 3 T, and group 4, control group, was not exposed to magnetic field. After MRI exposure, all embryos were again put inside incubator to complete 48 h. “The new technique” was used to open eggs, a stereomicroscope was used for the examination of magnified external morphology, and each embryo was examined according to the Hamburger and Hamilton chicken embryo stages. Embryos who had delayed stages of development are considered growth retarded. Growth retardation criteria do not include small for stage. Results Compared with embryos not exposed to a magnetic field, there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of neural tube closure defects and growth retardation in the embryos exposed to magnetic fields ( p  &lt; 0.05). However, although the incidence of neural tube closure defects was expected to increase as exposure (tesla level) increased, we found a higher rate of defects in the 1.5-T group compared with the 3-T group. By contrast, the highest incidence of growth retardation was in the 3-T group, which was consistent with our expectation that growth retardation would be more likely as tesla level increased. Conclusions We therefore conclude that the use of magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool can result in midline closure defects and growth retardation in chicken embryos. We hypothesize that this may also be true for human embryos exposed to MRI. If a pregnant individual is to take an MRI scan, as for lumbar disc disease or any other any other reason, our results indicate that consideration should be given to an avoidance of MRI during pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-7040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-0350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3734-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29392421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animals ; Chick Embryo - radiation effects ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Embryonic Development - radiation effects ; Magnetic Fields - adverse effects ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neural Tube - diagnostic imaging ; Neural Tube - embryology ; Neural Tube - radiation effects ; Neural Tube Defects - diagnostic imaging ; Neural Tube Defects - etiology ; Neurosciences ; Neurosurgery ; Original Paper</subject><ispartof>Child's nervous system, 2018-05, Vol.34 (5), p.933-938</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d4a3bee425b9dbb774fbf28d86d8263cb7891f6718cd996bcfd17f5bd845d62d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d4a3bee425b9dbb774fbf28d86d8263cb7891f6718cd996bcfd17f5bd845d62d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8137-0510</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kantarcioglu, Emrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahilogullari, Gokmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaimoglu, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmis, Esin Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peker, Elif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yigman, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billur, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Sevim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erden, Ilhan Memet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unlü, Agahan</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on neural tube development in an early chicken embryo model</title><title>Child's nervous system</title><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><description>Purpose We aimed to determine whether varying the magnetic field during magnetic resonance imaging would affect the development of chicken embryos and neural tube defects. Methods Following incubation for 24 h, we exposed chicken embryos to varying magnetic fields for 10 min to assess the impact on development. Three magnetic resonance imaging devices were used, and the eggs were divided into four groups: group 1 is exposed to 1 T, group 2 is exposed to 1.5 T, group 3 is exposed to 3 T, and group 4, control group, was not exposed to magnetic field. After MRI exposure, all embryos were again put inside incubator to complete 48 h. “The new technique” was used to open eggs, a stereomicroscope was used for the examination of magnified external morphology, and each embryo was examined according to the Hamburger and Hamilton chicken embryo stages. Embryos who had delayed stages of development are considered growth retarded. Growth retardation criteria do not include small for stage. Results Compared with embryos not exposed to a magnetic field, there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of neural tube closure defects and growth retardation in the embryos exposed to magnetic fields ( p  &lt; 0.05). However, although the incidence of neural tube closure defects was expected to increase as exposure (tesla level) increased, we found a higher rate of defects in the 1.5-T group compared with the 3-T group. By contrast, the highest incidence of growth retardation was in the 3-T group, which was consistent with our expectation that growth retardation would be more likely as tesla level increased. Conclusions We therefore conclude that the use of magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool can result in midline closure defects and growth retardation in chicken embryos. We hypothesize that this may also be true for human embryos exposed to MRI. If a pregnant individual is to take an MRI scan, as for lumbar disc disease or any other any other reason, our results indicate that consideration should be given to an avoidance of MRI during pregnancy.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chick Embryo - radiation effects</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - radiation effects</subject><subject>Magnetic Fields - adverse effects</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neural Tube - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neural Tube - embryology</subject><subject>Neural Tube - radiation effects</subject><subject>Neural Tube Defects - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neural Tube Defects - etiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><issn>0256-7040</issn><issn>1433-0350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPxDAQhC0EguPgB9AglzQBv5LYJUK8JCSao7Zie30EEvuwE6T79xgdUFKtdndmpPkQOqPkkhLSXmVCuKQVobLiLReV2kMLKjivCK_JPloQVjdVSwQ5Qsc5vxFCa8nUITpiiismGF0gt3oFDN6DnXD0eOzWAabe4gQ5hi5YwH259WGNY8AB5tQNeJoNYAefMMTNCGHCfcBdwNClYYvta2_foWyjSduIx-hgOEEHvhsynP7MJXq5u13dPFRPz_ePN9dPleVCTJUTHTcAgtVGOWPaVnjjmXSycZI13JpWKuqblkrrlGqM9Y62vjZOito1zPElutjlblL8mCFPeuyzhWHoAsQ5a6pKb9WIuilSupPaFHNO4PUmlaZpqynR33D1Dq4ucPU3XK2K5_wnfjYjuD_HL80iYDtBLq-whqTf4pxCqfxP6hcZ94X-</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Kantarcioglu, Emrah</creator><creator>Kahilogullari, Gokmen</creator><creator>Zaimoglu, Murat</creator><creator>Atmis, Esin Ozlem</creator><creator>Peker, Elif</creator><creator>Yigman, Zeynep</creator><creator>Billur, Deniz</creator><creator>Aydin, Sevim</creator><creator>Erden, Ilhan Memet</creator><creator>Unlü, Agahan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-0510</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on neural tube development in an early chicken embryo model</title><author>Kantarcioglu, Emrah ; Kahilogullari, Gokmen ; Zaimoglu, Murat ; Atmis, Esin Ozlem ; Peker, Elif ; Yigman, Zeynep ; Billur, Deniz ; Aydin, Sevim ; Erden, Ilhan Memet ; Unlü, Agahan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d4a3bee425b9dbb774fbf28d86d8263cb7891f6718cd996bcfd17f5bd845d62d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chick Embryo - radiation effects</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - radiation effects</topic><topic>Magnetic Fields - adverse effects</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neural Tube - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neural Tube - embryology</topic><topic>Neural Tube - radiation effects</topic><topic>Neural Tube Defects - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neural Tube Defects - etiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kantarcioglu, Emrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahilogullari, Gokmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaimoglu, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmis, Esin Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peker, Elif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yigman, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billur, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Sevim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erden, Ilhan Memet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unlü, Agahan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child's nervous system</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kantarcioglu, Emrah</au><au>Kahilogullari, Gokmen</au><au>Zaimoglu, Murat</au><au>Atmis, Esin Ozlem</au><au>Peker, Elif</au><au>Yigman, Zeynep</au><au>Billur, Deniz</au><au>Aydin, Sevim</au><au>Erden, Ilhan Memet</au><au>Unlü, Agahan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on neural tube development in an early chicken embryo model</atitle><jtitle>Child's nervous system</jtitle><stitle>Childs Nerv Syst</stitle><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>933</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>933-938</pages><issn>0256-7040</issn><eissn>1433-0350</eissn><abstract>Purpose We aimed to determine whether varying the magnetic field during magnetic resonance imaging would affect the development of chicken embryos and neural tube defects. Methods Following incubation for 24 h, we exposed chicken embryos to varying magnetic fields for 10 min to assess the impact on development. Three magnetic resonance imaging devices were used, and the eggs were divided into four groups: group 1 is exposed to 1 T, group 2 is exposed to 1.5 T, group 3 is exposed to 3 T, and group 4, control group, was not exposed to magnetic field. After MRI exposure, all embryos were again put inside incubator to complete 48 h. “The new technique” was used to open eggs, a stereomicroscope was used for the examination of magnified external morphology, and each embryo was examined according to the Hamburger and Hamilton chicken embryo stages. Embryos who had delayed stages of development are considered growth retarded. Growth retardation criteria do not include small for stage. Results Compared with embryos not exposed to a magnetic field, there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of neural tube closure defects and growth retardation in the embryos exposed to magnetic fields ( p  &lt; 0.05). However, although the incidence of neural tube closure defects was expected to increase as exposure (tesla level) increased, we found a higher rate of defects in the 1.5-T group compared with the 3-T group. By contrast, the highest incidence of growth retardation was in the 3-T group, which was consistent with our expectation that growth retardation would be more likely as tesla level increased. Conclusions We therefore conclude that the use of magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool can result in midline closure defects and growth retardation in chicken embryos. We hypothesize that this may also be true for human embryos exposed to MRI. If a pregnant individual is to take an MRI scan, as for lumbar disc disease or any other any other reason, our results indicate that consideration should be given to an avoidance of MRI during pregnancy.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29392421</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00381-018-3734-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-0510</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0256-7040
ispartof Child's nervous system, 2018-05, Vol.34 (5), p.933-938
issn 0256-7040
1433-0350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993996456
source Springer Nature
subjects Animals
Chick Embryo - radiation effects
Disease Models, Animal
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Embryonic Development - radiation effects
Magnetic Fields - adverse effects
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neural Tube - diagnostic imaging
Neural Tube - embryology
Neural Tube - radiation effects
Neural Tube Defects - diagnostic imaging
Neural Tube Defects - etiology
Neurosciences
Neurosurgery
Original Paper
title The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on neural tube development in an early chicken embryo model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A57%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20on%20neural%20tube%20development%20in%20an%20early%20chicken%20embryo%20model&rft.jtitle=Child's%20nervous%20system&rft.au=Kantarcioglu,%20Emrah&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=933&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=933-938&rft.issn=0256-7040&rft.eissn=1433-0350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00381-018-3734-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993996456%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d4a3bee425b9dbb774fbf28d86d8263cb7891f6718cd996bcfd17f5bd845d62d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993996456&rft_id=info:pmid/29392421&rfr_iscdi=true