Loading…

The effects of resistance training of swallowing muscles on dysphagia in older people: A cluster, randomized, controlled trial

•We examined the effects of resistance training of swallowing muscles on dysphagia.•Interventions included tongue resistance and head flexion exercises.•Resistance training did not affect dysphagia or tongue pressure.•Better nutritional status correlated significantly with improved swallowing functi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2018-04, Vol.48, p.111-116
Main Authors: Wakabayashi, Hidetaka, Matsushima, Masato, Momosaki, Ryo, Yoshida, Shuhei, Mutai, Rieko, Yodoshi, Toshifumi, Murayama, Shinichi, Hayashi, Tetsuro, Horiguchi, Ryoko, Ichikawa, Hiroko
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We examined the effects of resistance training of swallowing muscles on dysphagia.•Interventions included tongue resistance and head flexion exercises.•Resistance training did not affect dysphagia or tongue pressure.•Better nutritional status correlated significantly with improved swallowing function. This study examined the effects of resistance training of swallowing muscles in community-dwelling older individuals with dysphagia. A cluster randomized controlled trial was performed in day-service and day-care facilities. The participants were older (≥65 y) community-dwelling individuals with dysphagia. The intervention group performed a tongue resistance exercise and a head flexion exercise against manual resistance. Both groups received a brochure on dysphagia rehabilitation. The primary endpoint was an improvement in dysphagia assessed by the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) score. Tongue pressure was the secondary endpoint. Participants included 47 men and 57 women, with a mean age ± standard deviation of 80 ± 7 y. At baseline, the median EAT-10 score was 7 (interquartile range, 5–12). A total of 91 patients, 43 in the intervention group (8 clusters) versus 48 in the control group (11 clusters), were assessed postintervention. The percentage of participants with EAT-10 scores
ISSN:0899-9007
1873-1244
DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2017.11.009