Loading…
The retroneural approach: an alternative technique for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections
Background Compared with other available injection techniques for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (LTFESIs), the traditionally performed subpedicular approach is associated with a higher risk of spinal cord infarction, a rare but catastrophic complication. Purpose To assess the sho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta radiologica (1987) 2018-12, Vol.59 (12), p.1508-1516 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Compared with other available injection techniques for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (LTFESIs), the traditionally performed subpedicular approach is associated with a higher risk of spinal cord infarction, a rare but catastrophic complication.
Purpose
To assess the short-term efficacy of the retroneural approach for computed tomography (CT)-guided LTFESIs with respect to different needle-tip positions.
Material and Methods
This retrospective analysis included 238 patients receiving 286 CT-guided LTFESIs from January 2013 to January 2016. Short-term outcomes in terms of pain relief were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline and 30 min after. The needle-tip location was categorized as extraforaminal, junctional, or foraminal relative to the neural foramen. Additionally, the distance from the needle tip to the nerve root was measured.
Results
A mean pain reduction of 3.22 points (±2.17 points) on the VAS was achieved. The needle-tip location was extraforaminal in 48% (136/286), junctional in 42% (120/286), and foraminal in 10% (28/286) of the cases. The mean distance from the needle tip to the nerve root was 3.83 mm (±3.37 mm). There was no significant correlation between pain relief and needle-tip position in relation to the neural foramen. Therapy success was not dependent on the distance between the needle tip and the nerve root. No major complications were observed.
Conclusion
In our population treated with LTFESIs, the retroneural approach was shown to be an effective technique, with no significant differences in pain relief following different needle-tip positions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0284-1851 1600-0455 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0284185118762248 |