Loading…

High lymphocyte count during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved pathologic complete response in esophageal cancer

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) can reduce tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. We examined absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir during nCRT for esophageal cancer (EC) and pathologic complete response (pCR). Patients with stage I–IVA EC (n = 313) treated 2007–2013 with nCRT followed by surgery were an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiotherapy and oncology 2018-09, Vol.128 (3), p.584-590
Main Authors: Fang, Penny, Jiang, Wen, Davuluri, Rajayogesh, Xu, Cai, Krishnan, Sunil, Mohan, Radhe, Koong, Albert C., Hsu, Charles C., Lin, Steven H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) can reduce tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. We examined absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir during nCRT for esophageal cancer (EC) and pathologic complete response (pCR). Patients with stage I–IVA EC (n = 313) treated 2007–2013 with nCRT followed by surgery were analyzed. ALC was obtained before, during/weekly, and one month after CRT. pCR was defined as no viable tumor cells at surgery. High ALC was defined as nadir of ≥0.35 × 103/μL (highest tertile). Comparison of continuous and categorical variables by pCR was assessed by ANOVA and Pearson’s chi-square. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of pCR and high ALC nadir. Eighty-nine patients (27.8%) achieved a complete pathological response (pCR). For patients with pCR, median ALC nadir was significantly higher than those without (0.35 × 103/μL vs 0.29 × 103/μL, p = 0.007). Patients maintaining high ALC nadir had a higher pCR rate (OR1.82, 95%CI 1.08–3.05, p = 0.024). Predictors of high ALC included treatment with proton therapy vs. IMRT (OR4.18, 95%CI 2.34–7.47, p 
ISSN:0167-8140
1879-0887
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.025