Loading…
Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging
International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of wa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied radiation and isotopes 2018-11, Vol.141, p.193-198 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713 |
container_end_page | 198 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Applied radiation and isotopes |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Valente, M. Vedelago, J. Chacón, D. Mattea, F. Velásquez, J. Pérez, P. |
description | International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average.
•Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2015832259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0969804317313222</els_id><sourcerecordid>2015832259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1qwzAQhEVpadK0rxB87MXuSrJs69YQ-geBXlp6FLIkGwU7SqQ4kLevTJJee9qFndnZ_RCaY8gw4OJpncmtl9oGlxHAVQY0A2BXaIqrkqS8ArhGU-AFTyvI6QTdhbAGgLzi5BZNCGeM0bKYosWP3Bufmt1gD7IzG2US1ySt6RLtgu1NHIakcT4Zw1zn2mPSG22V7BLby9Zu2nt008gumIdznaHv15ev5Xu6-nz7WC5WqcpxsU8bwnBdMdAUa6CkqaEEhrHWZcFqXnJQUjHNAZOCxI4YLnOlcJ6XBWhcYjpDj6e9W-92gwl70dugTNfJjXFDEBEDqyghjEdpcZIq70LwphFbH6_1R4FBjPjEWlzwjb5KABURXzTOzxlDHd_8s114RcHzSWDipwdrvAjKjtS09UbthXb2v4xfYvCDjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015832259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Valente, M. ; Vedelago, J. ; Chacón, D. ; Mattea, F. ; Velásquez, J. ; Pérez, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Valente, M. ; Vedelago, J. ; Chacón, D. ; Mattea, F. ; Velásquez, J. ; Pérez, P.</creatorcontrib><description>International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average.
•Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-8043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29555376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computed tomography ; Ferrous Compounds ; Gel dosimetry ; Gels ; Humans ; Monte Carlo Method ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Polymers ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Radiation Dosimeters - standards ; Radiation Dosimeters - statistics & numerical data ; Radiometry - standards ; Radiometry - statistics & numerical data ; Solutions ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Water ; Water-equivalence</subject><ispartof>Applied radiation and isotopes, 2018-11, Vol.141, p.193-198</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29555376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valente, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedelago, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chacón, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattea, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velásquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging</title><title>Applied radiation and isotopes</title><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><description>International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average.
•Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications.</description><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Ferrous Compounds</subject><subject>Gel dosimetry</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Radiation Dosimeters - standards</subject><subject>Radiation Dosimeters - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Radiometry - standards</subject><subject>Radiometry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water-equivalence</subject><issn>0969-8043</issn><issn>1872-9800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1qwzAQhEVpadK0rxB87MXuSrJs69YQ-geBXlp6FLIkGwU7SqQ4kLevTJJee9qFndnZ_RCaY8gw4OJpncmtl9oGlxHAVQY0A2BXaIqrkqS8ArhGU-AFTyvI6QTdhbAGgLzi5BZNCGeM0bKYosWP3Bufmt1gD7IzG2US1ySt6RLtgu1NHIakcT4Zw1zn2mPSG22V7BLby9Zu2nt008gumIdznaHv15ev5Xu6-nz7WC5WqcpxsU8bwnBdMdAUa6CkqaEEhrHWZcFqXnJQUjHNAZOCxI4YLnOlcJ6XBWhcYjpDj6e9W-92gwl70dugTNfJjXFDEBEDqyghjEdpcZIq70LwphFbH6_1R4FBjPjEWlzwjb5KABURXzTOzxlDHd_8s114RcHzSWDipwdrvAjKjtS09UbthXb2v4xfYvCDjA</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Valente, M.</creator><creator>Vedelago, J.</creator><creator>Chacón, D.</creator><creator>Mattea, F.</creator><creator>Velásquez, J.</creator><creator>Pérez, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging</title><author>Valente, M. ; Vedelago, J. ; Chacón, D. ; Mattea, F. ; Velásquez, J. ; Pérez, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Ferrous Compounds</topic><topic>Gel dosimetry</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Radiation Dosimeters - standards</topic><topic>Radiation Dosimeters - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Radiometry - standards</topic><topic>Radiometry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water-equivalence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valente, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedelago, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chacón, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattea, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velásquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valente, M.</au><au>Vedelago, J.</au><au>Chacón, D.</au><au>Mattea, F.</au><au>Velásquez, J.</au><au>Pérez, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging</atitle><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>141</volume><spage>193</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>193-198</pages><issn>0969-8043</issn><eissn>1872-9800</eissn><abstract>International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average.
•Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29555376</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-8043 |
ispartof | Applied radiation and isotopes, 2018-11, Vol.141, p.193-198 |
issn | 0969-8043 1872-9800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2015832259 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Computed tomography Ferrous Compounds Gel dosimetry Gels Humans Monte Carlo Method Phantoms, Imaging Polymers Quality Assurance, Health Care Radiation Dosimeters - standards Radiation Dosimeters - statistics & numerical data Radiometry - standards Radiometry - statistics & numerical data Solutions Tomography, X-Ray Computed Water Water-equivalence |
title | Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T21%3A57%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water-equivalence%20of%20gel%20dosimeters%20for%20radiology%20medical%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Applied%20radiation%20and%20isotopes&rft.au=Valente,%20M.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=141&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=193-198&rft.issn=0969-8043&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015832259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015832259&rft_id=info:pmid/29555376&rfr_iscdi=true |