Loading…

Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging

International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied radiation and isotopes 2018-11, Vol.141, p.193-198
Main Authors: Valente, M., Vedelago, J., Chacón, D., Mattea, F., Velásquez, J., Pérez, P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713
container_end_page 198
container_issue
container_start_page 193
container_title Applied radiation and isotopes
container_volume 141
creator Valente, M.
Vedelago, J.
Chacón, D.
Mattea, F.
Velásquez, J.
Pérez, P.
description International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average. •Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2015832259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0969804317313222</els_id><sourcerecordid>2015832259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1qwzAQhEVpadK0rxB87MXuSrJs69YQ-geBXlp6FLIkGwU7SqQ4kLevTJJee9qFndnZ_RCaY8gw4OJpncmtl9oGlxHAVQY0A2BXaIqrkqS8ArhGU-AFTyvI6QTdhbAGgLzi5BZNCGeM0bKYosWP3Bufmt1gD7IzG2US1ySt6RLtgu1NHIakcT4Zw1zn2mPSG22V7BLby9Zu2nt008gumIdznaHv15ev5Xu6-nz7WC5WqcpxsU8bwnBdMdAUa6CkqaEEhrHWZcFqXnJQUjHNAZOCxI4YLnOlcJ6XBWhcYjpDj6e9W-92gwl70dugTNfJjXFDEBEDqyghjEdpcZIq70LwphFbH6_1R4FBjPjEWlzwjb5KABURXzTOzxlDHd_8s114RcHzSWDipwdrvAjKjtS09UbthXb2v4xfYvCDjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015832259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Valente, M. ; Vedelago, J. ; Chacón, D. ; Mattea, F. ; Velásquez, J. ; Pérez, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Valente, M. ; Vedelago, J. ; Chacón, D. ; Mattea, F. ; Velásquez, J. ; Pérez, P.</creatorcontrib><description>International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average. •Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-8043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29555376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computed tomography ; Ferrous Compounds ; Gel dosimetry ; Gels ; Humans ; Monte Carlo Method ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Polymers ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Radiation Dosimeters - standards ; Radiation Dosimeters - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Radiometry - standards ; Radiometry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Solutions ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Water ; Water-equivalence</subject><ispartof>Applied radiation and isotopes, 2018-11, Vol.141, p.193-198</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29555376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valente, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedelago, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chacón, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattea, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velásquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging</title><title>Applied radiation and isotopes</title><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><description>International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average. •Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications.</description><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Ferrous Compounds</subject><subject>Gel dosimetry</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Radiation Dosimeters - standards</subject><subject>Radiation Dosimeters - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radiometry - standards</subject><subject>Radiometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water-equivalence</subject><issn>0969-8043</issn><issn>1872-9800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1qwzAQhEVpadK0rxB87MXuSrJs69YQ-geBXlp6FLIkGwU7SqQ4kLevTJJee9qFndnZ_RCaY8gw4OJpncmtl9oGlxHAVQY0A2BXaIqrkqS8ArhGU-AFTyvI6QTdhbAGgLzi5BZNCGeM0bKYosWP3Bufmt1gD7IzG2US1ySt6RLtgu1NHIakcT4Zw1zn2mPSG22V7BLby9Zu2nt008gumIdznaHv15ev5Xu6-nz7WC5WqcpxsU8bwnBdMdAUa6CkqaEEhrHWZcFqXnJQUjHNAZOCxI4YLnOlcJ6XBWhcYjpDj6e9W-92gwl70dugTNfJjXFDEBEDqyghjEdpcZIq70LwphFbH6_1R4FBjPjEWlzwjb5KABURXzTOzxlDHd_8s114RcHzSWDipwdrvAjKjtS09UbthXb2v4xfYvCDjA</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Valente, M.</creator><creator>Vedelago, J.</creator><creator>Chacón, D.</creator><creator>Mattea, F.</creator><creator>Velásquez, J.</creator><creator>Pérez, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging</title><author>Valente, M. ; Vedelago, J. ; Chacón, D. ; Mattea, F. ; Velásquez, J. ; Pérez, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Ferrous Compounds</topic><topic>Gel dosimetry</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Radiation Dosimeters - standards</topic><topic>Radiation Dosimeters - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radiometry - standards</topic><topic>Radiometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water-equivalence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valente, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedelago, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chacón, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattea, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velásquez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valente, M.</au><au>Vedelago, J.</au><au>Chacón, D.</au><au>Mattea, F.</au><au>Velásquez, J.</au><au>Pérez, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging</atitle><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>141</volume><spage>193</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>193-198</pages><issn>0969-8043</issn><eissn>1872-9800</eissn><abstract>International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average. •Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29555376</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-8043
ispartof Applied radiation and isotopes, 2018-11, Vol.141, p.193-198
issn 0969-8043
1872-9800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2015832259
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Computed tomography
Ferrous Compounds
Gel dosimetry
Gels
Humans
Monte Carlo Method
Phantoms, Imaging
Polymers
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Radiation Dosimeters - standards
Radiation Dosimeters - statistics & numerical data
Radiometry - standards
Radiometry - statistics & numerical data
Solutions
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Water
Water-equivalence
title Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T21%3A57%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water-equivalence%20of%20gel%20dosimeters%20for%20radiology%20medical%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Applied%20radiation%20and%20isotopes&rft.au=Valente,%20M.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=141&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=193-198&rft.issn=0969-8043&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015832259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-f251b850d31d032fb070511dd765b9790cac5d901262ac52e9a4cc144760d1713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015832259&rft_id=info:pmid/29555376&rfr_iscdi=true