Loading…

Using Appendicitis to Improve Estimates of Childhood Medicaid Participation Rates

Administrative data are often used to estimate state Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program duration of enrollment and insurance continuity, but they are generally not used to estimate participation (the fraction of eligible children enrolled) because administrative data do not include re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Academic pediatrics 2018-07, Vol.18 (5), p.593-600
Main Authors: Silber, Jeffrey H., Zeigler, Ashley E., Reiter, Joseph G., Hochman, Lauren L., Ludwig, Justin M., Wang, Wei, Calhoun, Shawna R., Pati, Susmita
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Administrative data are often used to estimate state Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program duration of enrollment and insurance continuity, but they are generally not used to estimate participation (the fraction of eligible children enrolled) because administrative data do not include reasons for disenrollment and cannot observe eligible never-enrolled children, causing estimates of eligible unenrolled to be inaccurate. Analysts are therefore forced to either utilize survey information that is not generally linkable to administrative claims or rely on duration and continuity measures derived from administrative data and forgo estimating claims-based participation. We introduce appendectomy-based participation (ABP) to estimate statewide participation rates using claims by taking advantage of a natural experiment around statewide appendicitis admissions to improve the accuracy of participation rate estimates. We used Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) for 2008–2010; and the American Community Survey for 2008–2010 from 43 states to calculate ABP, continuity ratio, duration, and participation based on the American Community Survey (ACS). In the validation study, median participation rate using ABP was 86% versus 87% for ACS-based participation estimates using logical edits and 84% without logical edits. Correlations between ABP and ACS with or without logical edits was 0.86 (P 
ISSN:1876-2859
1876-2867
DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.008