Loading…

Melatonin levels in human diabetic dental pulp tissue and its effects on dental pulp cells under hyperglycaemic conditions

Aim To investigate melatonin (MEL) levels in human dental pulp tissue (hDP) in type 2 diabetic (T2D) participants and the underlying molecular mechanisms of its effects in human dental pulp cells (hDPCs) under hyperglycaemia. Methodology The study included 16 healthy and 16 T2D participants who unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International endodontic journal 2018-10, Vol.51 (10), p.1149-1158
Main Authors: Milosavljević, A., DJukić, Lj, Toljić, B., Milašin, J., DŽeletović, B., Brković, B., Roganović, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim To investigate melatonin (MEL) levels in human dental pulp tissue (hDP) in type 2 diabetic (T2D) participants and the underlying molecular mechanisms of its effects in human dental pulp cells (hDPCs) under hyperglycaemia. Methodology The study included 16 healthy and 16 T2D participants who underwent vital pulp extirpation for hDP and four healthy participants undergoing third molar extraction for hDPCs analyses. MTT and NRU were used as tests for cytotoxicity. The pulp tissue levels of MEL, inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, as well as iNOS, histone acetyltransferase p300 (p300) and SOD activity levels in hDPCs incubated with MEL (0.1 and 1.0 mmol L−1) under normoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia were measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Comparisons between the two groups were made by unpaired t‐tests or Mann–Whitney test whilst the chi‐square test was used for dichotomous variables. To compare more groups, the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparison was used, whilst Spearman correlation was used to assess association between two variables. Results Melatonin was decreased (124.30 ± 21.6 vs. 240.0 ± 19.1 pg mL−1, P 
ISSN:0143-2885
1365-2591
DOI:10.1111/iej.12934