Young stand growth modeling for intensively-managed loblolly pine plantations in southeastern U.S

• Published in: Forest science 2004-12, Vol.50 (6), p.823-835
• Main Authors: Westfall, J.A, Burkhart, H.E, Allen, H.L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: age structure; equations; fertilizer application; Fertilizers; forest plantations; forest yields; growth models; intraspecific competition; mathematical models; Pinus taeda; Plant growth; Planting; silvicultural practices; simulation models; site preparation; tree age; tree and stand measurements; tree growth; Trees; weed control
• ISSN: 0015-749X; 1938-3738
• DOI: 10.1093/forestscience/50.6.823

Intensively managed loblolly pine stands are often subjected to a variety of silvicultural treatments at time of planting or shortly thereafter. However, most loblolly pine growth-and-yield models predict growth after crown closure has occurred. In this article, we describe the development and implementation of a system of equations designed to simulate growth of loblolly pine before the onset of intraspecific competition. Treatment response functions were also developed for various site preparation, herbaceous weed control, and fertilization practices. These functions modify the baseline model predictions to simulate the effects of treatments on tree growth and stand development. This system was incorporated into the PTAEDA2 growth-and-yield simulator to make growth projections from time of planting through rotation age for intensively managed stands of loblolly pine in the southeastern United States. Growth simulations specifying either bedding or disking showed increases in volume growth for both treatments. The shear-and-pile site-preparation method reduced growth rates slightly. Volume growth responses to herbaceous weed control were positive, with magnitude of increase largely depending on duration of treatment. Increases in volume attributable to fertilization at planting were related to types of element applied. The largest predicted response was for phosphorus fertilization, whereas application of potassium was the least effective fertilization treatment. Site preparation, weed control, and fertilization treatment combinations produced additional volume gains when compared to single treatments, while maintaining predicted values that are within biological limits for loblolly pine growth. Levels of response to treatments are consistent with results from published studies on intensive management practices. The addition of the precompetitive growth system did not significantly affect the predictive behavior of the PTAEDA2 model for untreated stands.