Loading…
Major bleeding with old and novel oral anticoagulants: How to manage it. Focus on general measures
In the last decade, the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in clinical practice has changed the therapeutic landscape in the prevention of thromboembolic events. Although NOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have demonstrated a similar or slightly lower ra...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of cardiology 2018-10, Vol.268, p.80-84 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In the last decade, the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in clinical practice has changed the therapeutic landscape in the prevention of thromboembolic events. Although NOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have demonstrated a similar or slightly lower rate of major bleeding and a lower rate of intracranial or fatal bleeding, hemorrhaging still represents the main adverse effect of anticoagulant treatment. This review reports data on the rates of major bleeding with old and new oral anticoagulants. It analyses laboratory tests that can be used to assess the intensity of anticoagulation in patients treated with oral anticoagulants and discusses general measures to implement in managing major bleeding.
[Display omitted]
•With old and new oral anticoagulants the global hemorrhagic risk is non-negligible.•In cases of serious bleeding the presence of anticoagulation effect should be assessed.•The amount of anticoagulant activity may guide reversal strategies.•Major bleedings should initially be treated with hemodynamic-supporting measures.•When appropriate, local mechanical hemostatic interventions should be employed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-5273 1874-1754 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.061 |