Use of zeolitised coal fly ash for landfill leachate treatment: A pilot plant study

• Published in: Waste management (Elmsford) 2007, Vol.27 (12), p.1877-1883
• Main Authors: Luna, Y., Otal, E., Vilches, L.F., Vale, J., Querol, X., Fernández Pereira, C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alum Compounds - chemistry; Applied sciences; Carbon - chemistry; Coal Ash; Electrolytes - chemistry; Exact sciences and technology; General purification processes; General treatment and storage processes; Other wastes and particular components of wastes; Particulate Matter - chemistry; Pilot Projects; Pollution; Refuse Disposal - methods; Sewage - chemistry; Urban and domestic wastes; Wastes; Wastewaters; Water treatment and pollution; Zeolites - chemistry
• ISSN: 0956-053X; 1879-2456
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.10.016

Treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill leachate generally results in low percentages of nutrient removal due to the high concentration and accumulation of refractory compounds. For this reason, individual physical, chemical and biological processes have been used for the treatment of raw landfill leachate and sometimes for the mixture of domestic wastewater and landfill leachate. In this work, the possibility of treating landfill leachate was tested in a bench-scale pilot plant by a two-step method combining adsorption and coagulation–flocculation. Zeolite synthesized from coal fly ash, a by-product of coal-fired power stations, was used in this study both as a decantation aid reagent and as an adsorbent of COD and NH 4–N. The coagulation–flocculation step was performed by the use of aluminium sulphate and a polyelectrolyte (ACTIPOL A-401). The leachate was collected directly from a storage unit of the organic fraction of MSW, before it was composted. For this reason the raw leachate was diluted before treatment. The sludge was recirculated to enhance the removal efficiency of nutrients as well as to optimize flocculant saving and to decrease sludge production. The results showed that it is possible to remove 43%, 53% and 82% of COD, NH 4–N, and suspended solids, respectively. Therefore, this method may be an alternative for ammonium removal, as well as a suitable pre- or post-treatment step, in combination with other processes in order to meet regulatory limits.