Loading…
Molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile strains recovered from clinical trials in the US, Canada and Europe from 2006-2009 to 2012-2015
The prevalence of C. difficile infection (CDI) and severe CDI are influenced by the prevalence of specific C. difficile strains, which are themselves influenced by antimicrobial susceptibility determinants as well as antimicrobial usage patterns. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing and an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anaerobe 2018-10, Vol.53, p.38-42 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-34497279aecb232d17947bc7533156ece1f9ef9cb20021aa3e37b101d8f5e37c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-34497279aecb232d17947bc7533156ece1f9ef9cb20021aa3e37b101d8f5e37c3 |
container_end_page | 42 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | Anaerobe |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Cheknis, Adam Johnson, Stuart Chesnel, Laurent Petrella, Laurica Sambol, Susan Dale, Suzanne E. Nary, Julia Sears, Pamela Citron, Diane M. Goldstein, Ellie J.C. Gerding, Dale N. |
description | The prevalence of C. difficile infection (CDI) and severe CDI are influenced by the prevalence of specific C. difficile strains, which are themselves influenced by antimicrobial susceptibility determinants as well as antimicrobial usage patterns. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were used to characterize 1808 C. difficile isolates obtained from patients enrolled in four multicenter, multi-country, randomized CDI treatment trials conducted between 2006 and 2009 and between 2012 and 2015. By 2015, the epidemic REA group BI strain (RT027) had decreased in prevalence in North America (US: 43%–18%, Canada: 39%–24%, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.05.009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2053271811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1075996418300945</els_id><sourcerecordid>2053271811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-34497279aecb232d17947bc7533156ece1f9ef9cb20021aa3e37b101d8f5e37c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQjRCIlsJfqHwsEgljO47jG2hVPqQiDtCz5dhj8MqJFzup1H_DT8WrbXvlYs8bvzfjmdc0lxQ6CnR4v-_MYjCnCTsGdOxAdADqWXNOQYl2ZLJ_foylaJUa-rPmVSl7AEp7IV42Z0yN4wACzpu_31JEu0WTCR6CwzmkmH7dk-TJLqay5uBCqvlCrp7wNr8lLngfbIhIas6EpZCMNt1hRkd8TjOxMSzBmkiqxMRCwkLW30huf7wju_p1Z4hZHLnecjrgScEAhrYeiqypAsoqoOJ188JXPb55uC-a20_XP3df2pvvn7_uPt60lg_j2vK-V5JJZdBOjDNHperlZKXgnIoBLVKv0Kv6CMCoMRy5nOom3ehFDS2_aK5OdQ85_dmwrHoOxWKMZsG0Fc1AcCbpSGmlDieqzamUjF4fcphNvtcU9NEdvdeP7uijOxqErnNV4eVDj22a0T3JHu2ohA8nAtZJ7wJmXWzAxaILdb2rdin8r8c_dfCjCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2053271811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile strains recovered from clinical trials in the US, Canada and Europe from 2006-2009 to 2012-2015</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Cheknis, Adam ; Johnson, Stuart ; Chesnel, Laurent ; Petrella, Laurica ; Sambol, Susan ; Dale, Suzanne E. ; Nary, Julia ; Sears, Pamela ; Citron, Diane M. ; Goldstein, Ellie J.C. ; Gerding, Dale N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheknis, Adam ; Johnson, Stuart ; Chesnel, Laurent ; Petrella, Laurica ; Sambol, Susan ; Dale, Suzanne E. ; Nary, Julia ; Sears, Pamela ; Citron, Diane M. ; Goldstein, Ellie J.C. ; Gerding, Dale N.</creatorcontrib><description>The prevalence of C. difficile infection (CDI) and severe CDI are influenced by the prevalence of specific C. difficile strains, which are themselves influenced by antimicrobial susceptibility determinants as well as antimicrobial usage patterns. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were used to characterize 1808 C. difficile isolates obtained from patients enrolled in four multicenter, multi-country, randomized CDI treatment trials conducted between 2006 and 2009 and between 2012 and 2015. By 2015, the epidemic REA group BI strain (RT027) had decreased in prevalence in North America (US: 43%–18%, Canada: 39%–24%, P < 0.001), but rates of moxifloxacin resistance remained high. In contrast, REA group Y (RT014/020) and DH (RT106) strains, both of which had low rates of moxifloxacin resistance, increased in prevalence (Y strain - US: 6%–17%, Canada: 11%–23%, P < 0.001; DH strain - US: 1%–11%, Canada: 0%–8%, P < 0.0001). In Europe, the BI strain (RT027) was highly prevalent in Eastern European countries in 2015, but was unchanged in other parts of Europe. As in North America, the Y strain (RT014/020) was prevalent in both time periods, but the DH strain was rarely identified. Continued international molecular surveillance of C. difficile will be important to track prevalence of known epidemic strains and detect emergence of new strains of potential epidemiologic significance.
•Epidemiology of C. difficile strains from multinational clinical trials is described.•Similar REA group strains were identified in North America and Europe.•REA group BI decreased in prevalence in North America between 2006 and 2015.•BI was prevalent in Eastern European Countries between 2012 and 2015.•An emerging strain, REA group DH, increased in North America between 2006 and 2015.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29886050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antimicrobial resistance ; Antimicrobial susceptibility ; Clostridioides difficile ; Clostridium difficile</subject><ispartof>Anaerobe, 2018-10, Vol.53, p.38-42</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-34497279aecb232d17947bc7533156ece1f9ef9cb20021aa3e37b101d8f5e37c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-34497279aecb232d17947bc7533156ece1f9ef9cb20021aa3e37b101d8f5e37c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29886050$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheknis, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesnel, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrella, Laurica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sambol, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dale, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nary, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Citron, Diane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Ellie J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerding, Dale N.</creatorcontrib><title>Molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile strains recovered from clinical trials in the US, Canada and Europe from 2006-2009 to 2012-2015</title><title>Anaerobe</title><addtitle>Anaerobe</addtitle><description>The prevalence of C. difficile infection (CDI) and severe CDI are influenced by the prevalence of specific C. difficile strains, which are themselves influenced by antimicrobial susceptibility determinants as well as antimicrobial usage patterns. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were used to characterize 1808 C. difficile isolates obtained from patients enrolled in four multicenter, multi-country, randomized CDI treatment trials conducted between 2006 and 2009 and between 2012 and 2015. By 2015, the epidemic REA group BI strain (RT027) had decreased in prevalence in North America (US: 43%–18%, Canada: 39%–24%, P < 0.001), but rates of moxifloxacin resistance remained high. In contrast, REA group Y (RT014/020) and DH (RT106) strains, both of which had low rates of moxifloxacin resistance, increased in prevalence (Y strain - US: 6%–17%, Canada: 11%–23%, P < 0.001; DH strain - US: 1%–11%, Canada: 0%–8%, P < 0.0001). In Europe, the BI strain (RT027) was highly prevalent in Eastern European countries in 2015, but was unchanged in other parts of Europe. As in North America, the Y strain (RT014/020) was prevalent in both time periods, but the DH strain was rarely identified. Continued international molecular surveillance of C. difficile will be important to track prevalence of known epidemic strains and detect emergence of new strains of potential epidemiologic significance.
•Epidemiology of C. difficile strains from multinational clinical trials is described.•Similar REA group strains were identified in North America and Europe.•REA group BI decreased in prevalence in North America between 2006 and 2015.•BI was prevalent in Eastern European Countries between 2012 and 2015.•An emerging strain, REA group DH, increased in North America between 2006 and 2015.</description><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Antimicrobial susceptibility</subject><subject>Clostridioides difficile</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><issn>1075-9964</issn><issn>1095-8274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQjRCIlsJfqHwsEgljO47jG2hVPqQiDtCz5dhj8MqJFzup1H_DT8WrbXvlYs8bvzfjmdc0lxQ6CnR4v-_MYjCnCTsGdOxAdADqWXNOQYl2ZLJ_foylaJUa-rPmVSl7AEp7IV42Z0yN4wACzpu_31JEu0WTCR6CwzmkmH7dk-TJLqay5uBCqvlCrp7wNr8lLngfbIhIas6EpZCMNt1hRkd8TjOxMSzBmkiqxMRCwkLW30huf7wju_p1Z4hZHLnecjrgScEAhrYeiqypAsoqoOJ188JXPb55uC-a20_XP3df2pvvn7_uPt60lg_j2vK-V5JJZdBOjDNHperlZKXgnIoBLVKv0Kv6CMCoMRy5nOom3ehFDS2_aK5OdQ85_dmwrHoOxWKMZsG0Fc1AcCbpSGmlDieqzamUjF4fcphNvtcU9NEdvdeP7uijOxqErnNV4eVDj22a0T3JHu2ohA8nAtZJ7wJmXWzAxaILdb2rdin8r8c_dfCjCw</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Cheknis, Adam</creator><creator>Johnson, Stuart</creator><creator>Chesnel, Laurent</creator><creator>Petrella, Laurica</creator><creator>Sambol, Susan</creator><creator>Dale, Suzanne E.</creator><creator>Nary, Julia</creator><creator>Sears, Pamela</creator><creator>Citron, Diane M.</creator><creator>Goldstein, Ellie J.C.</creator><creator>Gerding, Dale N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile strains recovered from clinical trials in the US, Canada and Europe from 2006-2009 to 2012-2015</title><author>Cheknis, Adam ; Johnson, Stuart ; Chesnel, Laurent ; Petrella, Laurica ; Sambol, Susan ; Dale, Suzanne E. ; Nary, Julia ; Sears, Pamela ; Citron, Diane M. ; Goldstein, Ellie J.C. ; Gerding, Dale N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-34497279aecb232d17947bc7533156ece1f9ef9cb20021aa3e37b101d8f5e37c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Antimicrobial susceptibility</topic><topic>Clostridioides difficile</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheknis, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesnel, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrella, Laurica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sambol, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dale, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nary, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Citron, Diane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Ellie J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerding, Dale N.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaerobe</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheknis, Adam</au><au>Johnson, Stuart</au><au>Chesnel, Laurent</au><au>Petrella, Laurica</au><au>Sambol, Susan</au><au>Dale, Suzanne E.</au><au>Nary, Julia</au><au>Sears, Pamela</au><au>Citron, Diane M.</au><au>Goldstein, Ellie J.C.</au><au>Gerding, Dale N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile strains recovered from clinical trials in the US, Canada and Europe from 2006-2009 to 2012-2015</atitle><jtitle>Anaerobe</jtitle><addtitle>Anaerobe</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>38</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>38-42</pages><issn>1075-9964</issn><eissn>1095-8274</eissn><abstract>The prevalence of C. difficile infection (CDI) and severe CDI are influenced by the prevalence of specific C. difficile strains, which are themselves influenced by antimicrobial susceptibility determinants as well as antimicrobial usage patterns. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were used to characterize 1808 C. difficile isolates obtained from patients enrolled in four multicenter, multi-country, randomized CDI treatment trials conducted between 2006 and 2009 and between 2012 and 2015. By 2015, the epidemic REA group BI strain (RT027) had decreased in prevalence in North America (US: 43%–18%, Canada: 39%–24%, P < 0.001), but rates of moxifloxacin resistance remained high. In contrast, REA group Y (RT014/020) and DH (RT106) strains, both of which had low rates of moxifloxacin resistance, increased in prevalence (Y strain - US: 6%–17%, Canada: 11%–23%, P < 0.001; DH strain - US: 1%–11%, Canada: 0%–8%, P < 0.0001). In Europe, the BI strain (RT027) was highly prevalent in Eastern European countries in 2015, but was unchanged in other parts of Europe. As in North America, the Y strain (RT014/020) was prevalent in both time periods, but the DH strain was rarely identified. Continued international molecular surveillance of C. difficile will be important to track prevalence of known epidemic strains and detect emergence of new strains of potential epidemiologic significance.
•Epidemiology of C. difficile strains from multinational clinical trials is described.•Similar REA group strains were identified in North America and Europe.•REA group BI decreased in prevalence in North America between 2006 and 2015.•BI was prevalent in Eastern European Countries between 2012 and 2015.•An emerging strain, REA group DH, increased in North America between 2006 and 2015.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29886050</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.05.009</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1075-9964 |
ispartof | Anaerobe, 2018-10, Vol.53, p.38-42 |
issn | 1075-9964 1095-8274 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2053271811 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Antimicrobial resistance Antimicrobial susceptibility Clostridioides difficile Clostridium difficile |
title | Molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile strains recovered from clinical trials in the US, Canada and Europe from 2006-2009 to 2012-2015 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A37%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Molecular%20epidemiology%20of%20Clostridioides%20(Clostridium)%20difficile%20strains%20recovered%20from%20clinical%20trials%20in%20the%20US,%20Canada%20and%20Europe%20from%202006-2009%20to%202012-2015&rft.jtitle=Anaerobe&rft.au=Cheknis,%20Adam&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=38-42&rft.issn=1075-9964&rft.eissn=1095-8274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2053271811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-34497279aecb232d17947bc7533156ece1f9ef9cb20021aa3e37b101d8f5e37c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2053271811&rft_id=info:pmid/29886050&rfr_iscdi=true |