Loading…

Systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies on delivery preferences in Brazil

Background Cesarean delivery rates in Brazil are among the highest in the world. User preference is often mentioned as an important factor driving this. Objectives To identify, appraise, and synthesize the results of studies into delivery preferences in Brazil. Search strategy MEDLINE, LILACS, and P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2018-10, Vol.143 (1), p.24-31
Main Authors: Reiter, Marilia, Betrán, Ana P., Marques, Fernando K., Torloni, Maria R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Cesarean delivery rates in Brazil are among the highest in the world. User preference is often mentioned as an important factor driving this. Objectives To identify, appraise, and synthesize the results of studies into delivery preferences in Brazil. Search strategy MEDLINE, LILACS, and PsycINFO databases were searched, without language restrictions, using “delivery” and “preference” from inception to November 4, 2017. Selection criteria Cross‐sectional or cohort studies with quantitative data on delivery preferences of lay persons in Brazil. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers performed study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction. A meta‐analysis of proportions with a preference for cesarean delivery was performed, including subgroups analyses. Main results There were 28 studies with 31 071 participants included. The overall prevalence of preference for cesarean delivery was 27.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.7%–27.7%; 28 studies, n=31 071). Cesarean delivery preference was higher among multiparas with previous cesarean deliveries (58.0%, 95% CI 56.6%–59.3%; nine studies, n=5542) than among multiparas without prior cesarean deliveries (17.3%, 95% CI 16.4%–18.2%; eight studies, n=7903), and among women with private health insurance (44.3%, 95% CI 43.0%–45.6%; nine studies, n=6048) than among those who depended on the public healthcare system (22.7%, 95% CI 22.2%–23.3%; 20 studies, n=24 314). Conclusions Overall, most lay persons in Brazil did not prefer to deliver by cesarean. In a meta‐analysis of 28 studies involving over 31 000 women in Brazil, nearly 27% of participants expressed a preference for cesarean delivery. This article includes a Portuguese translation of the , available in the Supporting Information section.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12570