Macrophytes as refuge or risky area for zooplankton: a balance set by littoral predacious macroinvertebrates

1. Zooplankton use macrophytes as day-time refuge areas when trying to escape from pelagic predators. But macrophytes can also host a diverse and abundant macroinvertebrate assemblage and zooplankton are also likely to face predacious macroinvertebrates once they enter the littoral zone. This study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Freshwater biology 2009-05, Vol.54 (5), p.1042-1053
Main Authors: SAGRARIO, GONZÁLEZ, de losÁNGELES, MARÍA, BALSEIRO, ESTEBAN, ITUARTE, ROMINA, SPIVAK, EDUARDO
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bosmina
Buenoa
Calanoida
Cladocera
Cyanallagma
Diaphanosoma brachyurum
Freshwater
macroinvertebrates
macrophytes
Moina micrura
Notodiaptomus
Palaemonetes argentinus
predation
refuge
zooplankton
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1. Zooplankton use macrophytes as day-time refuge areas when trying to escape from pelagic predators. But macrophytes can also host a diverse and abundant macroinvertebrate assemblage and zooplankton are also likely to face predacious macroinvertebrates once they enter the littoral zone. This study aimed to elucidate the role of macroinvertebrates in determining the refuge capacity of macrophytes. 2. We conducted a field enclosure experiment using plastic bags and complementary laboratory feeding trials to test how macroinvertebrates counteract the benefits to zooplankton of the macrophyte refuge. The field experiment consisted of three treatments with different macroinvertebrate assemblages: without predators (WP), low abundance and diversity (LAD) and high abundance and diversity of predators (HAD - which represents lake conditions). 3. Populations of Diaphanosoma brachyurum, Bosmina huaronensis and Moina micrura (Cladocera) and of both male and female Notodiaptomus incompositus (Copepoda, Calanoida) declined (by nearly 80%) in the presence of HAD in comparison to WP and LAD treatments. 4. Feeding trials revealed that Buenoa sp. (backswimmer), adults of Palaemonetes argentinus (grass shrimp) and Cyanallagma interruptum (damselfly) had a significant negative impact on cladocerans (D. brachyurum, B. huaronensis) and the calanoid copepod population (males, females and copepodites). These predators showed a strong predation effect ranging from 75% to 100% reductions of zooplankton populations. 5. The refuge effect offered by macrophytes to zooplankton depends on and is balanced by the predacious macroinvertebrate assemblage that plants host. The risk of confronting littoral predators is high and macroinvertebrate presence can turn the macrophytes into risky areas for zooplankton.
ISSN:0046-5070
1365-2427
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02152.x