Loading…
Comparison of peptide and superantigen-induced anergy in a peptide-specific polyclonal human T cell line
T cells recognizing tetanus toxin peptide ‘p2’ (sequence 830–844) raised in HLA DR6 individuals preferentially express Vβ2 in the TCR. A p2-specific T cell line (60% Vβ2+) was used to compare peptide and superantigen [toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1)]-induced clonal anergy. Many experiments con...
Saved in:
Published in: | International immunology 1995-07, Vol.7 (7), p.1057-1063 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | T cells recognizing tetanus toxin peptide ‘p2’ (sequence 830–844) raised in HLA DR6 individuals preferentially express Vβ2 in the TCR. A p2-specific T cell line (60% Vβ2+) was used to compare peptide and superantigen [toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1)]-induced clonal anergy. Many experiments consistently revealed that the degree of ‘tolerance’ or ‘clonal anergy’ induced by peptide was greater than with the superantigen TSST-1. These results are of interest in a number of contexts. First they suggest that using superantigens or anti-Vβ to delete the majority population of T cells may not be sufficient to diminish an autoimmune response. Secondly, the results indicate that induction of anergy of a large proportion of peptide-specific T cells does not lead to a suppressive bystander effect on the remaining responsive T cells. These results emphasize the need to define the dominant autoantigenic epitopes in human autoimmune diseases, since peptide based therapy such as the use of peptide analogues to induce anergy or a change in cytokine profile, is possibly more effective in controlling undesired immune responses than the use of non-antigen, TCR-directed approaches such as superantigens. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-8178 1460-2377 |
DOI: | 10.1093/intimm/7.7.1057 |