Neurogenic bowel management for the adult spinal cord injury patient

• Published in: World journal of urology 2018-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1587-1592
• Main Authors: Stoffel, John T., Van der Aa, F., Wittmann, D., Yande, S., Elliott, S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Anorectal; Colon; Conservative Treatment; Disease management; Humans; Ileostomy; Injuries; Intestine; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nephrology; Neurogenic Bowel - etiology; Neurogenic Bowel - therapy; Objectives; Oncology; Ostomy; Patients; Physiology; Quality of Life; Reflex, Abnormal; Reproducibility of Results; Sphincter; Spinal cord injuries; Spinal Cord Injuries - complications; Topic Paper; Urology
• ISSN: 0724-4983; 1433-8726
• DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2388-2

Background Bowel function can be markedly changed after a spinal cord injury (SCI). These changes, and the care associated with managing the changes, can greatly impact a person's quality of life over a lifetime. Purpose The purpose of the SIU-ICUD workgroup was to identify, assess, and summarize evidence and expert opinion-based themes and recommendations regarding bowel function and management in SCI populations. Methods As part of the SIU-ICUD joint consultation of Urologic Management of the Spinal Cord Injury, a workgroup was formed and comprehensive literature search of English language manuscripts regarding bowel physiology and management plans for the SCI patient. Articles were compiled, and recommendations in the chapter are based on group discussion and follow the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine system for levels of evidence (LOEs) and grades of recommendation (GORs). Results Neurogenic bowel symptoms are highly prevalent in the SCI population. Patients with injuries above the conus medullaris have increased bowel motility and poor anorectal sphincter relaxation. Patients with injuries below the conus are more likely to have an areflexic colon and low sphincter tone. Conservative management strategies include diet modification and anorectal stimulation. There are few evidence-based pharmacologic interventions, which improve fecal transit time. Intestinal ostomy can be an effective treatment for reducing hours spent per week on bowel management and colostomy may be easier to manage than ileostomy due to solid vs liquid stool. Conclusions By understanding physiology and treatment options, patients and care teams can work together to achieve goals and maximize quality of life after injury.