Loading…
Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and antithrombin versus antithrombin alone for the prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Background Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a substantial risk for thromboembolism (TE) that is related to L‐asparaginase‐induced antithrombin (AT) deficiency and placement of central venous lines. Recent in vitro studies showed that the anticoagulant effects of low‐molecular‐we...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2008-02, Vol.50 (2), p.298-303 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a substantial risk for thromboembolism (TE) that is related to L‐asparaginase‐induced antithrombin (AT) deficiency and placement of central venous lines. Recent in vitro studies showed that the anticoagulant effects of low‐molecular‐weight heparin were profoundly affected by endogenous AT levels in children undergoing ALL therapy.
Methods
A total of 112 consecutively recruited children with newly diagnosed ALL treated according to BFM 95/2000 protocols were enrolled in this trial. This prospective cohort study was carried out to determine the influence of combined low molecular weight heparin‐prophylaxis (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg/ per day) and AT supplementation versus AT alone (noncontemporaneous control group) on the incidence of symptomatic TE during a follow‐up of 240 days.
Results
To maintain AT plasma levels above 50%, nearly 60% of all children needed at least one, most children two or three AT supplementations during induction therapy. 12.7% of the children that did receive only AT‐prophylaxis (n = 71) (95% CI = 6.0–22.7) developed objectively confirmed symptomatic TE, as compared with no TE in children after combined prophylaxis (n = 41) (95% CI = 0.0–8.6, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1545-5009 1545-5017 1096-911X |
DOI: | 10.1002/pbc.21222 |