Loading…

Prevalence of sarcopenia in systemic sclerosis: assessing body composition and functional disability in patients with systemic sclerosis

•Sarcopenia is prevalent in patients with systemic sclerosis.•Sarcopenia is more prevalent in systemic sclerosis than otherwise found in a comparable age group.•Sarcopenic patients with systemic sclerosis suffer from impaired functional status. We analyzed the prevalence of sarcopenia among systemic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2018-11, Vol.55-56, p.51-55
Main Authors: Siegert, Elise, March, Christine, Otten, Lindsey, Makowka, Alexander, Preis, Emelina, Buttgereit, Frank, Riemekasten, Gabriela, Müller-Werdan, Ursula, Norman, Kristina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Sarcopenia is prevalent in patients with systemic sclerosis.•Sarcopenia is more prevalent in systemic sclerosis than otherwise found in a comparable age group.•Sarcopenic patients with systemic sclerosis suffer from impaired functional status. We analyzed the prevalence of sarcopenia among systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with respect to quality of life, disability, organ involvement, and muscle function. A total of 129 patients who met the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria were included. Body composition was measured using bioelectric impedance analysis. Sarcopenia was defined according to the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Handgrip and knee extension strength and pulmonary peak flow were measured. Physical function was assessed with the Short Form-36 Health Survey and Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire. Sarcopenia was prevalent in 22.5% of patients. There were significant differences between patients with and without sarcopenia regarding handgrip strength (11.5 [2.0–30.0] versus 18.0 [1.0–41.0] kilogram force [kgf]; P 
ISSN:0899-9007
1873-1244
DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2018.03.046