Loading…

Fate of Grafts Bypassing Nonischemic Versus Ischemic Inducing Coronary Stenosis

There is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of ischemia-guided coronary artery bypass grafting. We compared the incidence of graft failure between grafts bypassing ischemia-inducing and nonischemia-inducing stenoses. Between 1997 and 2011, 2,304 patients for whom baseline coronary angiography...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2018-10, Vol.122 (7), p.1148-1154
Main Authors: Roh, Jae-Hyung, Kim, Young-Hak, Yang, Dong Hyun, Han, Seungbong, Yun, Sung-Cheol, Yang, Dong Heon, Park, Gyung-Min, Lee, Pil Hyung, Ahn, Jung-Min, Kang, Joon-Won, Lim, Tae-Hwan, Moon, Dae Hyuk, Kim, Joon Bum, Jung, Sung-Ho, Chung, Cheol Hyun, Choo, Suk Jung, Lee, Jae Won, Kang, Soo-Jin, Park, Duk-Woo, Lee, Seung-Whan, Lee, Cheol Whan, Park, Seong-Wook, Park, Seung-Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of ischemia-guided coronary artery bypass grafting. We compared the incidence of graft failure between grafts bypassing ischemia-inducing and nonischemia-inducing stenoses. Between 1997 and 2011, 2,304 patients for whom baseline coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging were available were identified from a single-center coronary artery bypass grafting registry. According to baseline myocardial perfusion imaging, each graft was assigned to either graft bypassing ischemia-inducing or nonischemia-inducing stenoses (ischemia-related grafts, n = 4,904; ischemia-unrelated grafts, n = 2,709). Graft failure was defined as total occlusion on coronary computed tomography angiography, performed at the discretion of the treating physician. The incidence of graft failure was compared on a per-graft basis. At 5 years, the incidence of graft failure was significantly higher in the ischemia-unrelated grafts (4.2% vs 2.9% in ischemia-related grafts; p = 0.003). Ischemia-related graft was an independent determinant of graft patency (adjusted hazard ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.84; p = 0.002). Increased risk of graft failure associated with ischemia-unrelated graft was observed only in the internal thoracic artery (3.3% vs 2.0%, p = 0.021) and arterial grafts (6.5% vs 4.3%, p = 0.020), but not in the venous grafts (2.7% vs 2.7%; p = 0.99). In terms of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, 5-year incidences were comparable between the patients with and without ischemia-unrelated grafts (219, 19.3% vs 160, 18.0%; p = 0.61). In conclusion, ischemia-unrelated grafts became dysfunctional more frequently than ischemia-related grafts, and were not preventive of adverse events.
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.06.028