Loading…

Downstream hydraulic geometry of rivers in Victoria, Australia

Downstream variation of hydraulic geometry in rivers, characterized by fine textured banks and low width to depth ratios (7–25), is investigated in Victoria, Australia, with the aim of developing predictive models of channel geometry for large-scale spatial modeling applications. A one-dimensional h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2008-07, Vol.99 (1), p.302-316
Main Authors: De Rose, Ronald C., Stewardson, Michael J., Harman, Ciaran
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Downstream variation of hydraulic geometry in rivers, characterized by fine textured banks and low width to depth ratios (7–25), is investigated in Victoria, Australia, with the aim of developing predictive models of channel geometry for large-scale spatial modeling applications. A one-dimensional hydraulic model is used to determine the mean bank-full geometry and discharge ( Q bf) for 93 sites which are investigated in relation to discharge of fixed average recurrence interval (ARI). The median bank-full ARI is estimated at 0.8 years with 75% of sites between 0.5 and 2.5 years. Exponents in the downstream hydraulic geometry relations for width, depth and velocity are respectively 0.43, 0.40 and 0.18 ( Q = Q bf) and 0.44, 0.38 and 0.03 ( Q = Q 2, i.e., 2-year ARI), falling near the mode of global values. Q 2 and slope explain 66% of variance in Q bf, while Q 2 explains 73% and 69% of the variance in width and depth relations, respectively: Q 2 provides a reliable substitute for Q bf in spatial modeling applications. Spatial variation in hydraulic geometry relations within and between river basins remains largely unexplained. The W/ D ratio characteristically decreases with increasing distance along the lower reaches of most rivers and this has contributed to the lower than expected value for the width exponent.
ISSN:0169-555X
1872-695X
DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.11.008