Loading…
The Phosphate Content of Prescription Medication: A New Consideration
Background: Phosphate restriction is needed in most dialysis patients. The package inserts from some medications indicate that phosphate may be part of the excipient fraction of drugs. It is unclear whether its amount may be clinically significant since the phosphate content is unquantified. Methods...
Saved in:
Published in: | Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science 2015-11, Vol.49 (6), p.886-889 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background:
Phosphate restriction is needed in most dialysis patients. The package inserts from some medications indicate that phosphate may be part of the excipient fraction of drugs. It is unclear whether its amount may be clinically significant since the phosphate content is unquantified.
Methods:
We reviewed the package inserts for the branded formulations of the most widely used drugs at a dialysis chain. We measured the phosphate levels in a sample of the branded form of these drugs and some of their generic formulations. We also reviewed the available package inserts of 16 selected generic drug manufacturers for the presence of phosphate in drugs that were phosphate free in their branded formulation.
Results:
We identified 12 prescription products that contained phosphate, 9 of which contained clinically significant quantities (>10 mg per daily dose) notably in both branded and generic forms of amlodipine, lisinopril, paroxetine and bisoprolol. Phosphate was rarely present in a generic drug when its corresponding branded formulation was phosphate free.
Conclusion:
Commonly prescribed drugs may contain clinically important levels of phosphate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2168-4790 2168-4804 |
DOI: | 10.1177/2168479015592194 |