Maternity and paternity leave in otolaryngology residency training in the United States

Objectives/Hypothesis This study evaluates the existence and nature of maternity and paternity leave policies for residents during otolaryngology training. The study sought to survey program directors (PDs) on the impact of parental leave. Study Design Cross‐sectional survey. Methods An electronic s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope 2019-05, Vol.129 (5), p.1093-1099
Main Authors: Tang, Alice L., Miller, Adam, Hauff, Samantha, Myer, Charles M., Takiar, Vinita, Howell, Rebecca J., Mark, Jonathan R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Attitude
Cross-Sectional Studies
Family leave
Female
formal parental leave
Humans
Internship and Residency
Male
Maternity & paternity leaves
Maternity leave
Middle Aged
Otolaryngology
Otolaryngology - education
otolaryngology training
Parental Leave
paternity leave
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives/Hypothesis This study evaluates the existence and nature of maternity and paternity leave policies for residents during otolaryngology training. The study sought to survey program directors (PDs) on the impact of parental leave. Study Design Cross‐sectional survey. Methods An electronic survey was sent to 103 otolaryngology residency PDs. A link to a 10‐page, 30‐question survey was provided. Descriptive statistics and comments were collected. Results Forty‐one respondents (39.8%) completed the survey, all of whom were from university‐based programs. Programs from the Midwest (n = 11, 26.8%), Northeast (n = 12, 29.3%), South (n = 12, 29.3%) and West (n = 6, 14.6%) were represented. Sixteen (42%) programs reported having a written formal maternity leave policy for trainees, and 13 (32%) programs had a paternity‐specific policy. Four programs reported using short‐term disability, whereas 11 programs reported using the Family Medical Leave Act to accommodate parental leave. Policies primarily followed the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Otolaryngology guidelines, with factors such as clinical duties and call schedules left to the programs' discretion. Although the majority of PDs (56%) reported support of residents who planned to become pregnant during training, many expressed concerns regarding the burden on co‐residents and the difficulty of fulfilling training obligations for the resident taking leave. Conclusions Many institutions do not have parental leave policies and logistics regarding leave are left to the discretion of individual programs. Surveyed PDs addressed the challenges of becoming a parent during training and the potential burden placed on the program when trainees take leave. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 129:1093–1099, 2019
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.27328